hyperium/hyper - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

An HTTP library for Rust

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 56/100

External PR Merge Rate: 49%

Response Time: 12h

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is hyperium/hyper welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

hyperium/hyper has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in hyperium/hyper respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 12.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.4 places hyperium/hyper in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for hyperium/hyper?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for hyperium/hyper is 48.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in hyperium/hyper?

hyperium/hyper currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

hyperium
hyperium/hyperA•Welcoming16.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
hyperium

hyperium/hyper

16,360
InactiveA•Welcoming(56/100)Rust

An HTTP library for Rust

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in hyperium/hyper welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
12 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
48.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
20 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
48.6%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe60/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for hyperium/hyper
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/hyperium/hyper)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/hyperium/hyper?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

hyper for a long time never bothered with clippy. Mostly for historical reasons and opinions. I've now come around to just turning clippy up to 11. What I'm currently leaning towards is keeping an allowlist, and otherwise denying pedantic and even restriction lints. Yes, I know there's a restriction lint against linting for the restriction group. An allowlist still makes a lot of sense to me. If after a bit it turns out to be just unbearable, we can convert it to a bigger deny list, I guess. The initial config is in place, with a CI job that enforce it, so we won't regress with new code. Now, we just need to evaluate all the undecided lints, and either choose to allow them for sure, or fix them. How to help Look at the list of lints that need to be decided upon in the Cargo.toml (it's around there, the line might move slightly). Pick a lint. If it seems obviously an improvement: Fix up the code from the lint. It might be as simple as cargo clippy --fix --features full. It might be o

📅 Opened May 19, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Version hyper-util 0.1.20 (also present in 0.1.16, 0.1.19) Platform Windows Summary On Windows, Matcher::from_system() reads the registry value HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ProxyServer and assigns its raw string verbatim to builder.http and builder.https. This only works for the single-proxy form. The per-scheme WinINET form (e.g. http=127.0.0.1:8080;https=127.0.0.1:8443;socks=127.0.0.1:1080) is not parsed, which results in malformed proxy URIs like http://socks=127.0.0.1 being produced downstream. Code Sample Configure Windows system proxy with per-scheme entries, so the registry contains, for example: ProxyServer = socks=127.0.0.1:1080 (This is what Windows writes when only a SOCKS proxy is configured via the Internet Settings UI in some setups, and the same format applies when multiple schemes are configured: http=...;https=...;socks=....) Then build a client that uses system proxies (e.g. reqwest with the system-proxy feature, which calls hype

📅 Opened May 11, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 35/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for hyperium/hyper

When evaluating whether to contribute to hyperium/hyper, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of hyperium/hyper acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 12 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 48.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to hyperium/hyper

01

Is hyperium/hyper welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

hyperium/hyper has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~12 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.4 places hyperium/hyper in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for hyperium/hyper?

The external pull request merge rate is 48.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in hyperium/hyper?

Yes, hyperium/hyper currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for hyperium/hyper are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.