heygen-com/hyperframes - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 68/100

External PR Merge Rate: 66%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is heygen-com/hyperframes welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

heygen-com/hyperframes has a recorded first-timer success rate of 45.6%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in heygen-com/hyperframes respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 27.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.2 places heygen-com/hyperframes in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for heygen-com/hyperframes?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for heygen-com/hyperframes is 66.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in heygen-com/hyperframes?

heygen-com/hyperframes currently has 12 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

heygen-com
heygen-com/hyperframesA•Welcoming60.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
heygen-com

heygen-com/hyperframes

60,567
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(68/100)TypeScript

Write HTML. Render video. Built for agents.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
7.9/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Balanced & professional review environment in heygen-com/hyperframes. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
45.6%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
29 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.1%
Merge Gauge
45.6%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe49/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for heygen-com/hyperframes
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/heygen-com/hyperframes)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/heygen-com/hyperframes?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Describe the bug hyperframes docs examples prints packages/cli/src/docs/examples.md, which lists three templates for init --example: blank, title-card and video-edit. title-card and video-edit don't exist. init resolves examples from registry/examples/, which has decision-tree, kinetic-type, nyt-graph, play-mode, product-promo, swiss-grid, vignelli and warm-grain, plus the built-in blank. Steps to reproduce npx hyperframes docs examples npx hyperframes init demo --example title-card --non-interactive Expected behavior The topic lists the examples init --example actually accepts. Actual behavior It lists two that don't exist and none of the eight that do. Suggested fix Update packages/cli/src/docs/examples.md to list blank and the examples in registry/examples/, with a one-line description each (the descriptions are in each example's registry-item.json). Better still, add a test that fails when the topic and registry/examples/ disagree, so this can't drift again.

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem Almost every lint finding carries a fixHint telling the user what to change. Three don't: invalid_composition_variables_declaration, both branches in packages/lint/src/rules/composition.ts (around lines 462 and 477): an entry that isn't an object, and an entry missing id, type, label or default. css_parse_error in packages/lint/src/rules/core.ts (around line 726). Without a hint, lint and check show only the message, while every other finding also tells you how to fix it. Proposed solution Add a fixHint to each of these findings, written like the hints on neighbouring rules: short and concrete. For example, show the shape of a valid variables entry ({ "id": "title", "type": "string", "label": "Title", "default": "Hello" }), and for a CSS parse error, point at the reported line and the usual causes (an unclosed brace or quote). Acceptance criteria All three findings include a fixHint. The existing tests that cover these codes assert the hint is present. bun run --cwd packages

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem These lint rules have no test that mentions their code, so a change that breaks them would go unnoticed: Code Severity Defined at slideshow_unresolved_ref error packages/lint/src/rules/slideshow.ts:75 subcomposition_root_styled_by_class error packages/lint/src/rules/composition.ts:1274 Tests go in packages/lint/src/rules/slideshow.test.ts and packages/lint/src/rules/composition.test.ts. Proposed solution Add tests to the matching *.test.ts file next to each rule, following the style of the other tests in that file. For each rule, add at least: one composition that triggers the finding, asserting the code and severity, and one similar composition that should not trigger it. Read the rule's code first: the condition it checks tells you what the minimal triggering composition looks like. Acceptance criteria Each code above is asserted by at least one positive and one negative test. bun run --cwd packages/lint test passes. No rule behaviour changes. If writing a test

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem These lint rules have no test that mentions their code, so a change that breaks them would go unnoticed: Code Severity Defined at audio_reactive_single_tween_per_group warning packages/lint/src/rules/gsap.ts:1526 gsap_group_selector_keyframes warning packages/lint/src/rules/gsap.ts:2241 Tests go in packages/lint/src/rules/gsap.test.ts. Proposed solution Add tests to the matching *.test.ts file next to each rule, following the style of the other tests in that file. For each rule, add at least: one composition that triggers the finding, asserting the code and severity, and one similar composition that should not trigger it. Read the rule's code first: the condition it checks tells you what the minimal triggering composition looks like. Acceptance criteria Each code above is asserted by at least one positive and one negative test. bun run --cwd packages/lint test passes. No rule behaviour changes. If writing a test shows a rule misbehaving, note it in the PR or open

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem These lint rules have no test that mentions their code, so a change that breaks them would go unnoticed: Code Severity Defined at duplicate_media_discovery_risk warning packages/lint/src/rules/media.ts:466 self_closing_media_tag error packages/lint/src/rules/media.ts:636 placeholder_media_url error packages/lint/src/rules/media.ts:662 Tests go in packages/lint/src/rules/media.test.ts. Proposed solution Add tests to the matching *.test.ts file next to each rule, following the style of the other tests in that file. For each rule, add at least: one composition that triggers the finding, asserting the code and severity, and one similar composition that should not trigger it. Read the rule's code first: the condition it checks tells you what the minimal triggering composition looks like. Acceptance criteria Each code above is asserted by at least one positive and one negative test. bun run --cwd packages/lint test passes. No rule behaviour changes. If writing a test

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for heygen-com/hyperframes

When evaluating whether to contribute to heygen-com/hyperframes, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of heygen-com/hyperframes acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to heygen-com/hyperframes

01

Is heygen-com/hyperframes welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

heygen-com/hyperframes has a recorded first-timer success rate of 45.6%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.2 places heygen-com/hyperframes in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for heygen-com/hyperframes?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in heygen-com/hyperframes?

Yes, heygen-com/hyperframes currently has 12 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for heygen-com/hyperframes are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.