guacsec/guac - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

GUAC aggregates software security metadata into a high fidelity graph database.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 63%

Response Time: 14h

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is guacsec/guac welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

guacsec/guac has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in guacsec/guac respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 14.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.5 places guacsec/guac in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for guacsec/guac?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for guacsec/guac is 63.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in guacsec/guac?

guacsec/guac currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

guacsec
guacsec/guacA•Welcoming1.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
guacsec

guacsec/guac

1,553
InactiveA•Welcoming(66/100)Go

GUAC aggregates software security metadata into a high fidelity graph database.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in guacsec/guac welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
13 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
9 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.0%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe69/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for guacsec/guac
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/guacsec/guac)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/guacsec/guac?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Currently the lint is checked on the diff in a PR. There are several lint issues currently in the existing codebase which can be fixed in a phased manner. 102 issues: errcheck: 50 staticcheck: 50 unused: 2

📅 Opened Apr 10, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Describe the bug This failure in seen in several recent runs of the CI for Integration Tests workflow === Failed === FAIL: pkg/guacanalytics Test_SearchSubgraphFromVuln/Test_case_1:_two_levels_of_dependents,_no_stopID_and_no_limiting_maxDepth_ (0.00s) patchPlanning_test.go:1505: error ingesting test data: error in ingesting package: Post "http://localhost:9090/query": dial tcp [::1]:9090: connect: connection refused === FAIL: pkg/guacanalytics Test_SearchSubgraphFromVuln (0.27s) 2026-03-19T05:53:18.519Z INFO logging/logger.go:79 Logging at debug level {"guac-version": "v0.0.1-custom"} 2026-03-19T05:53:18.519Z DEBUG logging/logger.go:111 InitLogger has not been called. Defaulting to debug log level {"guac-version": "v0.0.1-custom"} 2026-03-19T05:53:18.520Z INFO guacanalytics/patchPlanning_test.go:1679 starting server {"guac-version": "v0.0.1-custom"} here2026-03-19T05:53:18.792Z INFO guacanalytics/patchPlanning_test.go:1682 server finished: http: Server closed {"guac-version": "v0.

📅 Opened Mar 19, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, the project does not include fuzz tests. This means certain classes of bugs—such as unexpected input handling issues, parsing errors, or edge-case crashes—may go undetected during regular unit or integration testing. OpenSSF scorecard also flags this currently. Describe the solution you'd like Introduce fuzz testing for components that process external or complex inputs (e.g., parsers, input validation logic, and serialization/deserialization paths). Modern fuzzing approaches such as coverage-guided fuzzing (e.g., Go’s native fuzzing support) can help automatically generate diverse inputs and uncover hidden edge cases. Best practices could include: Starting with fuzz tests for critical input-handling functions. Using Go’s built-in fuzzing framework (go test -fuzz) for easy integration. Running fuzz tests periodically in CI or as part of security testing workflows. Describe alternatives you've considered

📅 Opened Mar 15, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for guacsec/guac

When evaluating whether to contribute to guacsec/guac, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of guacsec/guac acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 13 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to guacsec/guac

01

Is guacsec/guac welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

guacsec/guac has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~13 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.5 places guacsec/guac in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for guacsec/guac?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in guacsec/guac?

Yes, guacsec/guac currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for guacsec/guac are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.