googleapis/mcp-toolbox - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

MCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 66%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is googleapis/mcp-toolbox welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

googleapis/mcp-toolbox has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.1%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in googleapis/mcp-toolbox respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 55.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.6 places googleapis/mcp-toolbox in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for googleapis/mcp-toolbox?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for googleapis/mcp-toolbox is 65.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in googleapis/mcp-toolbox?

googleapis/mcp-toolbox currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

googleapis
googleapis/mcp-toolboxA•Welcoming16.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
googleapis

googleapis/mcp-toolbox

16,630
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(59/100)Go

MCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
5.8/10
Patience Score
6.6/10
Nitpick Rate
54%

Rigorous architecture standards (83% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in googleapis/mcp-toolbox.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
65.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
57.1%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
64 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
65.7%
Merge Gauge
57.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe43/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for googleapis/mcp-toolbox
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/googleapis/mcp-toolbox)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/googleapis/mcp-toolbox?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Prerequisites Search the current open issues Question Issue Description ​Environment Details ​Tool: MCP Toolbox ​Version: v1.2.0 ​Connector/Database: BigQuery ​Feature: Telemetry (Tracing) ​Problem Description ​After enabling the telemetry feature in mcp-toolbox (v1.2.0) while using the BigQuery tool, the system repeatedly issues span write requests to Google Cloud Trace (google.devtools.cloudtrace.v2.TraceService/BatchWriteSpans) approximately every 5 seconds. ​This high-frequency export interval introduces unnecessary network and processing overhead, and leads to unexpected Cloud Trace ingestion costs—especially in idle or low-traffic environments. ​Currently, is there granular control available to adjust the trace batch export interval or to disable specific trace exporters while keeping standard metrics/logging enabled. Code No response Additional Details No response

📅 Opened Aug 24, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Prerequisites Search the current open issues What are you trying to do that currently feels hard or impossible? Navigating to the base URL of an integration, such as https://mcp-toolbox.dev/integrations/alloydb/, currently results in a dead end. Users clicking on the top-level integration name (e.g., AlloyDB PostgreSQL) expect to see an overview or the main configuration page, but instead hit a page with no content. Expected behavior The base path for any integration (e.g., /integrations/<integration_name>/) should automatically redirect users to its corresponding /source endpoint (e.g., /integrations/<integration_name>/source/). Suggested Solution(s) Implement an automatic redirect rule in the documentation site's routing configuration so that whenever a user navigates to an integration's root directory, they are seamlessly redirected to the source documentation page. For example: https://mcp-toolbox.dev/integrations/alloydb/ ➡️ https://mcp-toolbox.dev/integrations/alloydb/sour

📅 Opened Jul 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Update gemini.md to add instruction for agent to check for security vulnerabilities.

📅 Opened Jul 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 25/100Contribute

Prerequisites Search the current open issues Closest matches found: #3543 (structural config validation) and #3634 (SQL-statement validation) cover validation timing; #2086 is about missing env vars in the Gemini CLI extension packaging. None address interpolation semantics for set-but-empty variables, which is a distinct gap. What are you trying to do that currently feels hard or impossible? Express "this optional field should only exist when its env var has a non-empty value" in tools.yaml — and more generally, get fail-fast behavior when a variable is set but empty. Current behavior in ConfigParser.parseEnv (cmd/internal/config.go): State of VAR ${VAR} ${VAR:default} unset ✅ startup error ("environment variable not found") uses default set to "" silently interpolates "" silently interpolates "" set to value interpolates value interpolates value The set-but-empty row is the trap, because in containerized deployments (Cloud Run, Kubernetes, Compose) a declared env

📅 Opened Jul 15, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for googleapis/mcp-toolbox

When evaluating whether to contribute to googleapis/mcp-toolbox, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of googleapis/mcp-toolbox acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 65.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to googleapis/mcp-toolbox

01

Is googleapis/mcp-toolbox welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

googleapis/mcp-toolbox has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.1%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.6 places googleapis/mcp-toolbox in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for googleapis/mcp-toolbox?

The external pull request merge rate is 65.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in googleapis/mcp-toolbox?

Yes, googleapis/mcp-toolbox currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for googleapis/mcp-toolbox are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.