google/perfetto - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Production-grade client-side tracing, profiling, and analysis for complex software systems.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 78%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is google/perfetto welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

google/perfetto has a recorded first-timer success rate of 78.3%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in google/perfetto respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 72.1 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 72.1 places google/perfetto in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for google/perfetto?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for google/perfetto is 77.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in google/perfetto?

google/perfetto currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

google
google/perfettoS•Elite6.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
google

google/perfetto

6,637
Active (30d)S•Elite(72/100)C++

Production-grade client-side tracing, profiling, and analysis for complex software systems.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in google/perfetto. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
77.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
78.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
47 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
77.6%
Merge Gauge
78.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for google/perfetto
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/google/perfetto)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/google/perfetto?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Objects with no doc comment get the nearest comment block above the CREATE as their description, even when a blank line separates them. This is usually the license header. For example, _all_counters_per_process in linux/memory/general.sql is described as "Copyright 2024 The Android Open Source Project…", and _graph_scan_df_agg as "sqlformat file off". 17 objects are affected today, all of them internal. Junk descriptions are worse than empty ones. UI autocomplete and agent tooling that read this table present license text as documentation, and these objects no longer look undocumented. Likely cause: LastBlockStart and get_stmt_desc in sql_module_doc_parser.cc take the last block of comments before the statement without checking that it ends directly above the CREATE.

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

__intrinsic_stdlib_objects reports the wrong argument docs for macros with more than one argument: every argument gets the first argument's comment. For example, graph_table and start_nodes on graph_reachable_bfs in graphs/search.sql both show the graph_table description. This affects roughly 30 of the 78 multi-argument macros. The UI's query editor and DataExplorer take their stdlib docs from this table, so users see wrong docs for public macros like graph_reachable_bfs. Argument docs matter most for macros because the arguments are untyped table and subquery parameters. Likely cause: ExtractMacroArgs in src/trace_processor/util/sql_module_doc_parser.cc uses syntaqlite_node_leading_comments(item_id). PerfettoMacroArg nodes are built inside the left-recursive perfetto_macro_arg_list_ne rule in perfetto.y, and for them this call seems to return the first token of the whole list rather than of each argument. Function and table arguments are unaffected because ExtractArgDefList finds the

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem If I put TRACE_EVENT or TRACE_EVENT_BEGIN macros inside a lambda, the MSVC compiler runs for infinite time without finish. To reproduce Try to compile this simple code with perfetto v52.0-6942f195e and toolchain: VS 2026 18.10.1, MSVC 14.51.36231, v145, Release x64. I noticed the same problem also with older versions of MSVC. #include <perfetto.h> #include <iostream> PERFETTO_DEFINE_CATEGORIES(perfetto::Category("lambda_test")); PERFETTO_TRACK_EVENT_STATIC_STORAGE(); int main() { perfetto::TracingInitArgs args; args.backends = perfetto::kInProcessBackend; perfetto::Tracing::Initialize(args); perfetto::TrackEvent::Register(); auto traced_lambda = [] { TRACE_EVENT("lambda_test", "LambdaTraceEvent"); std::cout << "Lambda called\n"; }; perfetto::TraceConfig config; config.add_buffers()->set_size_kb(1024); auto session = perfetto::Tracing::NewTrace(); session->Setup(config); session->StartBlocking(); traced_lambda(); perfetto::TrackEvent::Flush(); session->Sto

📅 Opened Sep 23, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Following the instructions to download prebuilt trace_processor, it SIGILLs when doing anything as simple as trace_processor --help. This machine is an older Xeon but still x86_64, and it looks like the precompiled binary expects something newer but does not check for it. Following https://perfetto.dev/docs/analysis/trace-processor#shell curl -LO https://get.perfetto.dev/trace_processor chmod +x ./trace_processor gdb --args python ./trace_processor --help run ... Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x0000555555cea51c in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000555555cea51c in ?? () #1 0x00005555561b7bd4 in ?? () #2 0x000055555618a7fa in ?? () #3 0x000055555618ea88 in ?? () #4 0x000055555618eca0 in ?? () #5 0x00005555561fbc96 in ?? () #6 0x00007ffff7c27934 in __libc_start_main () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #7 0x0000555555aefce5 in ?? () (gdb) x/i $pc => 0x555555cea51c: mulx %rcx,%rcx,%rax /proc/cpuinfo reports E5-2650 and no bmi2 support. I know I can probably build it my

📅 Opened Sep 21, 2026💬 12 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The calltree view is cool but it doesn't do a good job of expanding eagerly in the case where there's only a single possible child. We should eagerly expand on every entry as long as there's only one child.

📅 Opened Sep 9, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for google/perfetto

When evaluating whether to contribute to google/perfetto, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of google/perfetto acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 77.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to google/perfetto

01

Is google/perfetto welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

google/perfetto has a recorded first-timer success rate of 78.3%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 72.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 72.1 places google/perfetto in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for google/perfetto?

The external pull request merge rate is 77.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in google/perfetto?

Yes, google/perfetto currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for google/perfetto are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.