google-deepmind/formal-conjectures - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A collection of formalized statements of conjectures in Lean.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 43%

Response Time: 5h

First Timer Success: 35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is google-deepmind/formal-conjectures welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

google-deepmind/formal-conjectures has a recorded first-timer success rate of 35.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 4.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.6 places google-deepmind/formal-conjectures in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for google-deepmind/formal-conjectures?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for google-deepmind/formal-conjectures is 43.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures?

google-deepmind/formal-conjectures currently has 11 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

google-deepmind
google-deepmind/formal-conjecturesA•Welcoming1.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
google-deepmind

google-deepmind/formal-conjectures

1,194
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)LELean

A collection of formalized statements of conjectures in Lean.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Run the repository formatter and linter locally

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
Response Velocity
4 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
43.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
35.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
91 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
43.2%
Merge Gauge
35.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe54/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for google-deepmind/formal-conjectures
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What is the conjecture The Ramsey number $R(5,5)$ is defined as the smallest positive integer $n$ such that every 2-coloring of the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ contains either a monochromatic clique of 5 vertices or a monochromatic independent set of 5 vertices. Equivalently, for any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, either $G$ or its complement $\overline{G}$ contains a clique of size 5. The exact value of $R(5,5)$ remains unknown, but it is bounded: $43 \leq R(5,5) \leq 48$. Also add conjectures for other small values. (This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.) Sources: https://oeis.org/A212954, https://mathworld.wolfram.com/RamseyNumber.html, https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2017/03/29/r55-%E2%89%A4-48/, https://ajc.maths.uq.edu.au/pdf/5/ocr-ajc-v5-p13.pdf, https://math.mit.edu/~apost/courses/18.204_2018/ramsey-numbers.pdf Prerequisites needed Formalizability Rating: 1/5 (0 is best) (as of 2026-02-19) Bui

📅 Opened Feb 19, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

What is the conjecture The Van der Waerden number $W(r, k)$ is the smallest positive integer $n$ such that for every partition of the set ${1, 2, \ldots, n}$ into $r$ disjoint subsets, at least one subset contains an arithmetic progression of length $k$. The core open problem is to determine exact values of $W(r, k)$ for arbitrary pairs $(r, k)$. Known exact values are extremely rare: only the pairs $(2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (2, 6), (3, 3), (4, 3), (5, 3), (6, 3), (2, 8), (3, 4)$ have been computed exactly. Computing even the next value remains an open computational challenge. Related open problems include improving upper and lower bounds for $W(r, k)$ and determining whether the mixed van der Waerden numbers are concave. (This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.) Sources: Wikipedia: Van der Waerden number Wolfram MathWorld: Van der Waerden Numbers Open Problem Garden: Concavity of van d

📅 Opened Feb 13, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

What is the conjecture Let $a_n$ denote the number of distinct flat foldings of a $1 \times n$ rectangular strip with horizontal and vertical creases marked as mountain or valley folds. The sequence ${a_n}$ (OEIS A000136) begins: $$a_1 = 1, \quad a_2 = 2, \quad a_3 = 6, \quad a_4 = 16, \quad a_5 = 50, \quad a_6 = 144, \quad a_7 = 462, \quad a_8 = 1392, \quad \ldots$$ The Growth Rate Conjecture: Determine the precise limiting ratio: $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}$$ It is known that this limit exists and lies in the interval $[3.3868, 3.9821]$, indicating exponential growth of $a_n$. However: The exact value of the limit remains unknown. It is unclear whether the limit has a closed form or is a transcendental number. Whether this limit can be expressed in terms of known mathematical constants is an open question. The similar problem for $2 \times n$ maps (OEIS A001415) also lacks a known growth rate formula. (This description may contain subtle errors especially on more comp

📅 Opened Feb 13, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

What is the conjecture For a positive integer $n$, define the aliquot sequence as the sequence $(s_0, s_1, s_2, \ldots)$ where $s_0 = n$ and $s_{i+1} = \sigma(s_i) - s_i$ for $i \geq 0$. Here $\sigma(m)$ denotes the sum of all positive divisors of $m$, and $\sigma(m) - m$ is the sum of proper divisors of $m$. The Catalan-Dickson conjecture states that every aliquot sequence is bounded. Specifically, every such sequence either terminates (reaches 1), reaches a perfect number (a number equal to the sum of its proper divisors), or enters a cycle of sociable numbers (numbers that are part of a periodic cycle under the aliquot iteration, including amicable pairs as special cases of length 2). (This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.) Sources: Wikipedia: Aliquot sequence Wolfram MathWorld: Catalan's Aliquot Sequence Conjecture ProofWiki: Catalan-Dickson Conjecture OEIS: Aliquot sequences Carl Pomerance: Ali

📅 Opened Feb 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

What is the conjecture A periodic group is a group in which every element has finite order. A finitely presented group is a group that can be described using a finite set of generators and finitely many relations between them. The conjecture asks: If $G$ is a finitely presented group and $G$ is periodic, must $G$ be finite? Equivalently: Does there exist a finitely presented group $G$ such that $G$ is periodic but $G$ is infinite? (This description may contain subtle errors especially on more complex problems; for exact details, refer to the sources.) Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_group, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentation_of_a_group, Olshanskii, A. Yu. (1991). Geometry of defining relations in groups (Mathematics and Its Applications), Hall, M. (1959). The theory of groups (Macmillan) Prerequisites needed Formalizability Rating: 1.5/5 (0 is best) (as of 2026-02-03) Building blocks (1-3; from search results): Group and finite order concepts (via orderOf in M

📅 Opened Feb 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Lean beginner tasks?Explore Lean GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for google-deepmind/formal-conjectures

When evaluating whether to contribute to google-deepmind/formal-conjectures, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of google-deepmind/formal-conjectures acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 4 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 43.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to google-deepmind/formal-conjectures

01

Is google-deepmind/formal-conjectures welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

google-deepmind/formal-conjectures has a recorded first-timer success rate of 35.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~4 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.6 places google-deepmind/formal-conjectures in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for google-deepmind/formal-conjectures?

The external pull request merge rate is 43.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures?

Yes, google-deepmind/formal-conjectures currently has 11 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for google-deepmind/formal-conjectures are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.