gojue/ecapture - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Capture SSL/TLS plaintext with eBPF—no MITM proxy or custom CA installation. Supports Linux and Android on x86_64 and arm64.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 25/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is gojue/ecapture welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

gojue/ecapture has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in gojue/ecapture respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 43.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 25.1 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 25.1 places gojue/ecapture in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for gojue/ecapture?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for gojue/ecapture is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in gojue/ecapture?

gojue/ecapture currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

gojue
gojue/ecaptureD•Risky15.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
gojue

gojue/ecapture

15,492
InactiveD•Risky(25/100)C

Capture SSL/TLS plaintext with eBPF—no MITM proxy or custom CA installation. Supports Linux and Android on x86_64 and arm64.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in gojue/ecapture. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in gojue/ecapture focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for gojue/ecapture
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/gojue/ecapture)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/gojue/ecapture?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Feature Request: Support Oracle's libnnzsrv.so (nz* symbols) for Master Secret Extraction Background: Currently, eCapture's OpenSSL probe targets the standard OpenSSL API (e.g., SSL_do_handshake, SSL_SESSION_get_master_key) and attaches uprobes to those symbols to extract TLS master secrets. However, Oracle's libnnzsrv.so library, as used in Oracle Database clients and some proprietary apps, does not expose those OpenSSL symbols. Instead, it uses custom symbols with an nz* prefix for its own TLS implementation, causing eCapture's current uprobes to miss these flows entirely. Proposed Solution: Use readelf -s or nm -D on libnnzsrv.so to identify nz* symbols that are analogous to the OpenSSL functions currently hooked by eCapture. Create a new probe following the pattern of the existing OpenSSL probe, but targeting these nz* symbols instead. Implement a custom uprobe for the key extraction logic in Oracle's TLS implementation. Optionally, document any gotchas or kernel-version-specific

📅 Opened May 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more C beginner tasks?Explore C GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for gojue/ecapture

When evaluating whether to contribute to gojue/ecapture, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of gojue/ecapture acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to gojue/ecapture

01

Is gojue/ecapture welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

gojue/ecapture has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 25.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 25.1 places gojue/ecapture in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for gojue/ecapture?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in gojue/ecapture?

Yes, gojue/ecapture currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for gojue/ecapture are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.