goharbor/harbor-cli - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Official Harbor CLI

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 42/100

External PR Merge Rate: 38%

Response Time: 6d

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is goharbor/harbor-cli welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

goharbor/harbor-cli has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in goharbor/harbor-cli respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 136.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 41.9 C-Rankâ„¢ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 41.9 places goharbor/harbor-cli in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for goharbor/harbor-cli?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for goharbor/harbor-cli is 38.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in goharbor/harbor-cli?

goharbor/harbor-cli currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

goharbor
goharbor/harbor-cliB•Solid159
GitHub
Back to Explorer
goharbor

goharbor/harbor-cli

159
B•Solid(42/100)Go

Official Harbor CLI

Compare•
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in goharbor/harbor-cli. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
5 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
38.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
18 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
38.5%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe25/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for goharbor/harbor-cli
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/goharbor/harbor-cli)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/goharbor/harbor-cli?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

harbor-cli/cmd/harbor/root/context/switch.go Line 27 in 6bde8c6 Use: "switch <none|context>", this line should be changed - the word none should be removed from here.

📅 Opened Jul 28, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Problem The Harbor CLI currently validates cron expressions in multiple places, for example in: pkg/views/scan-all/update/view.go and cmd/harbor/root/scan_all/update_schedule.go This creates duplicated validation logic and makes future changes harder to maintain. If the validation behavior needs to be updated, it may need to be changed in several files, which increases the risk of inconsistent behavior or missed updates. Proposed Solution Centralize cron expression validation in the utils package. The duplicated validation logic should be moved into a reusable utility function, for example something like: utils.ValidateCronExpression(...) Both the view layer and the command implementation should then use this shared function instead of maintaining their own validation logic. This would make the behavior consistent across the CLI and reduce duplication. Alternatives Considered An alternative would be to keep the current validation logic in each location, but that leaves the code duplica

📅 Opened May 3, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for goharbor/harbor-cli

When evaluating whether to contribute to goharbor/harbor-cli, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of goharbor/harbor-cli acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 38.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to goharbor/harbor-cli

01

Is goharbor/harbor-cli welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

goharbor/harbor-cli has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 41.9 C-Rankâ„¢ score represent?

The C-Rankâ„¢ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 41.9 places goharbor/harbor-cli in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for goharbor/harbor-cli?

The external pull request merge rate is 38.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in goharbor/harbor-cli?

Yes, goharbor/harbor-cli currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rankâ„¢ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for goharbor/harbor-cli are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.

goharbor/harbor-cli • 41.9/100 C-Rank (B-Tier) | GetMerged