goauthentik/authentik - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The authentication glue you need.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 75%

Response Time: 4d

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is goauthentik/authentik welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

goauthentik/authentik has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in goauthentik/authentik respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 85.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.2 places goauthentik/authentik in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for goauthentik/authentik?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for goauthentik/authentik is 74.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in goauthentik/authentik?

goauthentik/authentik currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

goauthentik
goauthentik/authentikA•Welcoming25.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
goauthentik

goauthentik/authentik

25,883
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(59/100)Python

The authentication glue you need.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
29%

Balanced & professional review environment in goauthentik/authentik. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
3 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
74.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
81 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
74.8%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe45/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for goauthentik/authentik
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/goauthentik/authentik)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/goauthentik/authentik?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Is your feature request related to a problem? The policies table (Customization -> Policies) has 3 columns: Name (sortable), Type (unsortable), and Actions. I'd like to have a "last edited" column so I can easily sort and see the policies I am working on or that somebody recently changed on top. Otherwise I have to hunt for them by name. This applies to many other tables: Property Mappings, Files, Flows, Stages, Providers, Apps, etc. I know this should be possible because some tables already have this column. Reputation Scores have a sortable "Updated" column and Blueprints have "Last applied" column. Describe the solution you'd like No response Describe alternatives that you've considered I tried not having the column and it was not very convenient. Additional context 2026.5.4

📅 Opened Jul 20, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Describe the bug Bug: Runtime values are used as structured log event names or field keys Anti-pattern This report identifies logging calls where dynamic runtime data is used as the log event name or as a structured field key. In structured logging, event names and field keys should be stable schema elements. Runtime-specific data such as IDs, URLs, object names, errors, query labels, or caller-controlled keys should be emitted as field values under stable keys instead of changing the event or key surface. Impact on observability platforms When event names or field keys vary with runtime data, observability backends can see unnecessary cardinality growth in log streams, indexes, facets, labels, and dashboards. This makes queries harder to write, splits one logical event across many names or fields, increases storage and indexing cost, and can reduce the usefulness of alerts and aggregations. When opaque identifiers or shifted key/value pairs become field names, the resulting records ar

📅 Opened May 10, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

An option/flag to automatically set reputation score back to 0 for a user/IP upon successful login. Rather than just increasing reputation score by one.

📅 Opened Feb 10, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for goauthentik/authentik

When evaluating whether to contribute to goauthentik/authentik, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of goauthentik/authentik acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 74.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to goauthentik/authentik

01

Is goauthentik/authentik welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

goauthentik/authentik has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.2 places goauthentik/authentik in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for goauthentik/authentik?

The external pull request merge rate is 74.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in goauthentik/authentik?

Yes, goauthentik/authentik currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for goauthentik/authentik are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.