glzr-io/zebar - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Zebar is a tool for creating customizable and cross-platform taskbars, desktop widgets, and popups.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 26/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 4h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is glzr-io/zebar welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

glzr-io/zebar has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in glzr-io/zebar respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 25.6 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 25.6 places glzr-io/zebar in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for glzr-io/zebar?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for glzr-io/zebar is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in glzr-io/zebar?

glzr-io/zebar currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

glzr-io
glzr-io/zebarD•Risky3.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
glzr-io

glzr-io/zebar

3,079
InactiveD•Risky(26/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

Zebar is a tool for creating customizable and cross-platform taskbars, desktop widgets, and popups.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in glzr-io/zebar. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in glzr-io/zebar focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
Response Velocity
3 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe27/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for glzr-io/zebar
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/glzr-io/zebar)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/glzr-io/zebar?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Description Some tray icons are not detected by the systray provider, even though they are visible in the Windows system tray. Specifically, Toggl Track's tray icon is completely absent from output.systray.icons. Steps to Reproduce Have Toggl Track running with a visible tray icon in Windows Add systray: { type: 'systray' } to the provider group Log output.systray.icons — Toggl Track is missing from the list Expected Behavior All visible tray icons in Windows should be detected by the systray provider. Possible Root Cause Toggl Track may send Shell_NotifyIcon with a zero window handle and no GUID, causing it to fail the StableId assignment in systray.rs and be silently dropped: ust let stable_id = icon_data.guid.map(StableId::Guid).or({ match (icon_data.window_handle, icon_data.uid) { (Some(handle), Some(uid)) => Some(StableId::HandleUid(handle, uid)), _ => None, // <-- silently dropped } })?; Environment Zebar v3.x Windows (laptop) Additional Context The icon is visible in the

📅 Opened Jul 25, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Describe the bug My widget polls a local app on another port (e.g. localhost:8085) every second. After a while, the values stop updating. There are no errors and the polling loop keeps running, but the response is stale. In DevTools, the request changes from a normal 200 OK to: 200 OK (from service worker) and no longer has a remote address. The Date header is also from the previous response. This seems to come from resources/sw.js. It caches cross-origin GET requests, so requests to another localhost port get cached too. cache: 'no-store' doesn't help because the service worker handles the request before the browser's HTTP cache. There's also a second issue: initialization-script.js sends the caching config to the shared service worker whenever a window loads. Opening another widget can therefore reset the caching config for existing windows. I also couldn't find the caching config (defaultDuration, rules, urlRegex) in settings-schema.json, so there's currently no documented way to e

📅 Opened Jun 21, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Describe the problem/motivation Zebar appears to rely on a fixed localhost port (127.0.0.1:6124) for its internal local server / WebView loading flow. This can conflict with other resident applications that bind the same port. In my case, it conflicted with Shure MOTIV Mix / ShureDeviceManager, and Zebar showed a blank / white bar because its internal local endpoint was no longer owned by Zebar. Since background apps like this often start automatically at login and remain resident, users currently have no reliable way to avoid this kind of conflict. Describe the solution you'd like Please add a supported way to configure Zebar's localhost listen port. A setting, config field, environment variable, or CLI flag would all work. Keeping the current default port is fine, as long as users can override it when another application is already using that port. Alternatives considered Changing startup order can sometimes avoid the visible Zebar failure, but it does not remove the port conflict it

📅 Opened May 7, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 45/100Contribute

Describe the bug I’m not sure why, but when running Zebar on Windows 11, it frequently requests GPS access — almost once per second. It might be related to the weather component, but with such a high request frequency, could this cause excessive battery consumption? 不知道为什么,在windows11系统中 运行 zebar,会频繁请求GPS,几乎时每秒钟请求一次。 我猜或许是和天气信息组件有关,但如此高的请求频率,会不会很耗电? Reproduction No response Stack trace or error logs (if applicable) Version number v3.2.0

📅 Opened Feb 16, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for glzr-io/zebar

When evaluating whether to contribute to glzr-io/zebar, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of glzr-io/zebar acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to glzr-io/zebar

01

Is glzr-io/zebar welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

glzr-io/zebar has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 25.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 25.6 places glzr-io/zebar in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for glzr-io/zebar?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in glzr-io/zebar?

Yes, glzr-io/zebar currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for glzr-io/zebar are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.