github/docs - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The open-source repo for docs.github.com

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 51/100

External PR Merge Rate: 23%

Response Time: 18h

First Timer Success: 21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is github/docs welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

github/docs has a recorded first-timer success rate of 20.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in github/docs respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 17.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 51.1 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 51.1 places github/docs in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for github/docs?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for github/docs is 23.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in github/docs?

github/docs does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

github
github/docsB•Solid21.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
github

github/docs

20,973
Active (30d)B•Solid(51/100)TypeScript

The open-source repo for docs.github.com

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.0/10
Patience Score
6.7/10
Nitpick Rate
52%

Rigorous architecture standards (80% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in github/docs.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
17 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
23.3%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
20.7%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
110 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
23.3%
Merge Gauge
20.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe32/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for github/docs
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/github/docs)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/github/docs?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Code of Conduct I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct What article on docs.github.com is affected? https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/supply-chain-security/dependabot-options-reference#labels-- https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/tutorials/secure-your-dependencies/customizing-dependabot-prs (its default-labels text comes from data/reusables/dependabot/default-labels.md) What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated? The two articles describe Dependabot's default labels in ways that contradict each other: When the ecosystem label is added. The options reference (labels → "Dependabot default behavior") says the ecosystem label is added only when more than one package manager is defined. The customizing article (the default-labels reusable) says both the dependencies label and the ecosystem label are added to all pull requests, single-ecosystem updates included. Both can't be right; the observed behavior matches the se

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Code of Conduct I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct What article on docs.github.com is affected? Dependabot TSG: Pull request limit reached error vs. dependabot.yml options reference: open-pull-requests-limit key What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated? The dependabot.yml reference has this note: "Security update pull requests are not subject to this limit and do not count toward it. There is no limit on the number of open pull requests for security updates." The context of this note is within the open-pull-requests-limit section and as I've understood it, the first sentence is true. However, the second sentence seems to conflict with the TSG which calls out a hard limit of 10 open security update PRs. My confusion - does this maximum for open security update PRs exist? If yes, then the second sentence in the note should either be removed or tweaked to something like "The hard limit of 10 open PRs for security updates is not configur

📅 Opened Sep 29, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for github/docs

When evaluating whether to contribute to github/docs, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of github/docs acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 17 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 23.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to github/docs

01

Is github/docs welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

github/docs has a recorded first-timer success rate of 20.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~17 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 51.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 51.1 places github/docs in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for github/docs?

The external pull request merge rate is 23.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in github/docs?

github/docs does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for github/docs are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.