ghostwright/phantom - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

An AI co-worker with its own computer. Self-evolving, persistent memory, MCP server, secure credential collection, email identity. Built on the Claude Agent SDK.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 40/100

External PR Merge Rate: 31%

Response Time: 22h

First Timer Success: 17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ghostwright/phantom welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ghostwright/phantom has a recorded first-timer success rate of 16.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ghostwright/phantom respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 21.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 40.2 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 40.2 places ghostwright/phantom in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ghostwright/phantom?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ghostwright/phantom is 31.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ghostwright/phantom?

ghostwright/phantom currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ghostwright
ghostwright/phantomB•Solid1.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ghostwright

ghostwright/phantom

1,480
InactiveB•Solid(40/100)TypeScript

An AI co-worker with its own computer. Self-evolving, persistent memory, MCP server, secure credential collection, email identity. Built on the Claude Agent SDK.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in ghostwright/phantom. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in ghostwright/phantom focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
21 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
31.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
16.7%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
31.0%
Merge Gauge
16.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe31/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ghostwright/phantom
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ghostwright/phantom)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ghostwright/phantom?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Summary Add AgentMail as an alternative email channel for inbound email and two-way conversations, alongside the existing channels. Phantom already has outbound email via Resend (one API key, works out of the box). For inbound email and two-way conversations, the current option is IMAP/SMTP via ImapFlow + Nodemailer, which requires 8 credentials and manual IMAP configuration. AgentMail provides a simpler alternative: one API key for both sending and receiving, with native threading, webhook-based inbound delivery, and automatic deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC). Current email capabilities Capability Current solution Setup complexity Outbound email Resend (already built, one API key) Easy Inbound email IMAP via ImapFlow (8 credentials) Hard Two-way threads IMAP + SMTP + manual header threading Hard AgentMail would replace the IMAP/SMTP path with a single API key for both directions, while Resend remains the default for outbound-only use cases. Why The IMAP/SMTP channel requi

📅 Opened Mar 31, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ghostwright/phantom

When evaluating whether to contribute to ghostwright/phantom, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ghostwright/phantom acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 21 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 31.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ghostwright/phantom

01

Is ghostwright/phantom welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ghostwright/phantom has a recorded first-timer success rate of 16.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~21 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 40.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 40.2 places ghostwright/phantom in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ghostwright/phantom?

The external pull request merge rate is 31.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ghostwright/phantom?

Yes, ghostwright/phantom currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ghostwright/phantom are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.