getsentry/sentry - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 73/100

External PR Merge Rate: 78%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is getsentry/sentry welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getsentry/sentry has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.7%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in getsentry/sentry respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 72.5 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 72.5 places getsentry/sentry in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getsentry/sentry?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for getsentry/sentry is 78.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in getsentry/sentry?

getsentry/sentry currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

getsentry
getsentry/sentryS•Elite45.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
getsentry

getsentry/sentry

45,544
Active (30d)S•Elite(73/100)Python

Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in getsentry/sentry. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
78.1%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
76.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
151 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
78.1%
Merge Gauge
76.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe54/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for getsentry/sentry
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/getsentry/sentry)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/getsentry/sentry?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem Statement When a user receives an organization invitation and clicks "Accept your invite" in the email, they are directed to the "Accept organization invite" page. Instead of immediately showing a registration form with the invitation email pre-filled, the page displays multiple confusing options. Impact: Higher abandonment rates during user onboarding User confusion about which action to take next Unnecessary complexity for a core workflow Screenshots: Solution Brainstorm Current Behavior User receives email: "Join [Organization] in using Sentry" User clicks "Accept your invite" → Redirected to "Accept organization invite" page → Page shows multiple confusing options (rather than a clear registration form) Expected Behavior User clicks "Accept your invite" in the email → Directly shown a registration form with: Email field pre-filled (read-only or disabled) with the invitation email Password field Optional: Name field → After registration: User automatically

📅 Opened Aug 9, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Environment SaaS (https://sentry.io/) Steps to Reproduce Install the Slack integration and add an issue alert that posts new User Feedback issues to a Slack channel. Submit user feedback whose message contains line breaks. For example, via the Android SDK: Sentry.feedback().capture(Feedback("the app freezes on checkout\n\nreproduced twice")) Open the resulting Slack notification. Expected Result The notification renders a clickable link to the feedback, the same as it does when the feedback message is a single line. Actual Result The link prints as literal mrkdwn text, and nothing in the message is clickable: <https://<org>.sentry.io/feedback/?referrer=slack&notification_uid=…&workflow_id=…&alert_type=issue&feedbackSlug=…&project=…|*User Feedback: the app freezes on checkout reproduced twice*> Cause: Sentry titles a feedback issue User Feedback: <message verbatim>, so any newline the reporter typed becomes part of the issue title. The Slack message builder then interp

📅 Opened Aug 7, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Description I found an issue in the Russian translation. File: src/sentry/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/django.po Line: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/blob/368e1f0d6ea55b104452420ee404e2f376b18ebb/src/sentry/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/django.po#L12589 Current translation: "Выключтиь" Expected translation: "Выключить" Reason Brief explanation of why the current translation is incorrect (typo, grammar, incorrect wording, etc.). I'd be happy to open a pull request with the fix if needed.

📅 Opened Jul 27, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Environment SaaS (https://sentry.io/) Steps to Reproduce When a release URL has a trailing slash on the ?project= parameter value, the project ID is parsed as "12345/" instead of "12345". The page enters a loading state and then renders blank - no error message, no invalid project ID warning. Navigate to a release detail URL with a trailing slash on the project parameter: https://test.sentry.io/explore/releases/[email protected]+abcd123/?project=12345/ Observe the page loads indefinitely, then goes blank. Please find an actual customer example in the internal Linear ticket. Expected Result Either: The trailing slash is stripped and the page loads correctly, or A clear error is shown: "Invalid project ID" Actual Result The page enters a loading state and then renders blank with no error. There is no feedback to the user indicating what went wrong. Product Area Releases Link No response DSN No response Version No response

📅 Opened Jun 10, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Problem Statement When I change the date range on an Issue query, I always want the time-scale graph to be updated at the same time. But the graph always defaults to 24hours and I need to click the "3d" button to change it. Tiny friction point I almost always notice, because I start reading the graph immediately, and sometimes it takes me a few moments to realize the graph isn't where I want. CleanShot.2026-05-06.at.08.41.22.mp4 Solution Brainstorm No response Product Area Issues

📅 Opened May 7, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for getsentry/sentry

When evaluating whether to contribute to getsentry/sentry, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of getsentry/sentry acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 78.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to getsentry/sentry

01

Is getsentry/sentry welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getsentry/sentry has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.7%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 72.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 72.5 places getsentry/sentry in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getsentry/sentry?

The external pull request merge rate is 78.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in getsentry/sentry?

Yes, getsentry/sentry currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for getsentry/sentry are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.