getsentry/relay - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Sentry event forwarding and ingestion service.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is getsentry/relay welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getsentry/relay has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in getsentry/relay respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.4 places getsentry/relay in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getsentry/relay?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for getsentry/relay is 84.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in getsentry/relay?

getsentry/relay currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

getsentry
getsentry/relayA•Welcoming402
GitHub
Back to Explorer
getsentry

getsentry/relay

402
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)Rust

Sentry event forwarding and ingestion service.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.0/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in getsentry/relay. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.1%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
65.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
20 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.1%
Merge Gauge
65.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for getsentry/relay
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/getsentry/relay)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/getsentry/relay?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Sending an error without a trace context but DSC creates a trace context with a trace id derived from the event id, it should use the DSC provided trace id instead.

📅 Opened Aug 4, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for getsentry/relay

When evaluating whether to contribute to getsentry/relay, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of getsentry/relay acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to getsentry/relay

01

Is getsentry/relay welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getsentry/relay has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.4 places getsentry/relay in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getsentry/relay?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in getsentry/relay?

Yes, getsentry/relay currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for getsentry/relay are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.