getnao/nao - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

👾 nao is an open source analytics agent. (1) Create context with nao-core cli, (2) deploy nao chat interface for everyone

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 70/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is getnao/nao welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getnao/nao has a recorded first-timer success rate of 35.5%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in getnao/nao respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 70.4 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.4 places getnao/nao in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getnao/nao?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for getnao/nao is 63.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in getnao/nao?

getnao/nao currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

getnao
getnao/naoS•Elite1.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
getnao

getnao/nao

1,824
Active (30d)S•Elite(70/100)TypeScript

👾 nao is an open source analytics agent. (1) Create context with nao-core cli, (2) deploy nao chat interface for everyone

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in getnao/nao. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
35.5%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
28 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.7%
Merge Gauge
35.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe36/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for getnao/nao
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/getnao/nao)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/getnao/nao?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub
📅 Opened Feb 17, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 10/100Contribute
📅 Opened Feb 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 10/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for getnao/nao

When evaluating whether to contribute to getnao/nao, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of getnao/nao acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to getnao/nao

01

Is getnao/nao welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getnao/nao has a recorded first-timer success rate of 35.5%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 70.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.4 places getnao/nao in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getnao/nao?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in getnao/nao?

Yes, getnao/nao currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for getnao/nao are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.