getagentseal/codeburn - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Free, local tool to track AI coding token usage and cost across 37 tools and agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini and more), by model, project, and task. npx codeburn

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 72%

Response Time: 4d

First Timer Success: 52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is getagentseal/codeburn welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getagentseal/codeburn has a recorded first-timer success rate of 51.5%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in getagentseal/codeburn respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 93.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.9 places getagentseal/codeburn in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getagentseal/codeburn?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for getagentseal/codeburn is 71.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in getagentseal/codeburn?

getagentseal/codeburn currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

getagentseal
getagentseal/codeburnA•Welcoming11.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
getagentseal

getagentseal/codeburn

11,377
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)TypeScript

Free, local tool to track AI coding token usage and cost across 37 tools and agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini and more), by model, project, and task. npx codeburn

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.1/10
Nitpick Rate
28%

Balanced & professional review environment in getagentseal/codeburn. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
3 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
71.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
51.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
26 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
71.5%
Merge Gauge
51.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe44/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for getagentseal/codeburn
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/getagentseal/codeburn)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/getagentseal/codeburn?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Summary In OpenCode, archiving a session is an organizational action that simply sets a timestamp in the session.time_archived column of ~/.local/share/opencode/opencode.db. All session metadata, messages, parts, and token usages remain fully intact in SQLite. However, Codeburn's discovery query excludes archived sessions (WHERE time_archived IS NULL). Because opencode is treated as a standard non-durable provider, Codeburn interprets the absence of these sessions during discovery as file deletion, evicting them from the session cache (session-cache.v9) and stripping their token usage from historical metrics. Environment Codeburn Version: 0.9.23 Provider: OpenCode (opencode.db) OS: macOS (Apple Silicon) Steps to Reproduce Use OpenCode on any project/worktree to accumulate token spend. Run codeburn overview or codeburn sessions -p all to observe total token usage and cost. In OpenCode, archive the session (or a parent session with child subagents). This sets time_archived in opencode

📅 Opened Sep 13, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Ran a systematic multi-agent audit of the codebase tonight and want to record the results so nothing is lost, and so the remaining real candidates get a second set of eyes. Method Every app source line was reviewed in overlapping chunks by a bug-hunting pass, then each finding went through: a skeptical verifier (refute-by-default, given the real code window), then a 2-lens adversarial pass (reproducibility + caller-contract, survive only if neither refutes), then my own manual verification with a mutation-checked test on anything I turned into a fix. Funnel: 553 raw -> 270 triaged -> 121 verify-confirmed -> 103 adversarial-unanimous survivors. Key caveat for reviewers: the flash swarm kept known-false findings through all three automated stages (e.g. it insisted a SELECT DISTINCT ... ORDER BY <non-selected col> crashes SQLite - it does not; I confirmed empirically). Automated confirmation is NOT sufficient here; each survivor needs manual verification before it becomes a fix. That is e

📅 Opened Aug 4, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

The scoped remainder of #389, whose Lifetime half was fixed by #753 and #759. The CLI dashboard and the macOS menubar both run the adaptive refresh cadence (activity-aware interval, nap-aware backstop); the GNOME extension still refreshes on its original fixed schedule. Bring it to parity: adopt the same interval policy the macOS menubar uses (fast while sessions are active, slow when idle) keep the existing GNOME battery/idle behavior intact document the cadence in the extension README Needs a Linux/GNOME environment to test, which is why it did not move with the rest of #389; contributions welcome, a maintainer can validate behavior descriptions against the macOS implementation.

📅 Opened Aug 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for getagentseal/codeburn

When evaluating whether to contribute to getagentseal/codeburn, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of getagentseal/codeburn acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 71.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to getagentseal/codeburn

01

Is getagentseal/codeburn welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

getagentseal/codeburn has a recorded first-timer success rate of 51.5%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.9 places getagentseal/codeburn in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for getagentseal/codeburn?

The external pull request merge rate is 71.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in getagentseal/codeburn?

Yes, getagentseal/codeburn currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for getagentseal/codeburn are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.