gaul/s3proxy - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Access other storage backends via the S3 API

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 61/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 15h

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is gaul/s3proxy welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

gaul/s3proxy has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in gaul/s3proxy respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 14.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.6 places gaul/s3proxy in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for gaul/s3proxy?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for gaul/s3proxy is 84.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in gaul/s3proxy?

gaul/s3proxy currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

gaul
gaul/s3proxyA•Welcoming2.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
gaul

gaul/s3proxy

2,400
InactiveA•Welcoming(61/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Java

Access other storage backends via the S3 API

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in gaul/s3proxy. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
14 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.2%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe73/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for gaul/s3proxy
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/gaul/s3proxy)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/gaul/s3proxy?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

At the moment every S3Proxy client has to hold a long-lived access key and secret, and each key gets full access to whatever its backend can reach. I have a use case that would benefit from short-lived, scoped-down credentials on the same S3Proxy instance. The rough idea is similar to Cloudflare R2's temporary credentials. A holder of a configured key mints a session token signed with the parent key's secret. The token encodes the allowed actions, the prefixes or object keys it's limited to, and an expiry. The client keeps the parent access key ID, uses HMAC(parent_secret, token) as its secret access key, and sends the token in X-Amz-Security-Token. S3Proxy checks the token, derives the secret again to check the signature, and enforces the scope before calling the backend. Is there any appetite for something like this from the maintainers? I'm happy to adjust the design to your preferences.

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The Docker image currently runs everything as root. With #401 complete (jlink-trimmed JRE, #993), the remaining obvious hardening gap is dropping root: container scanners flag it (CIS Docker Benchmark 4.1), and the Kubernetes restricted Pod Security Standard rejects root images unless deployments override runAsUser. Non-root was deliberately deferred from the #993 review as out of scope, and it changes long-standing defaults, so filing this to collect feedback before committing to an approach. Current behavior dumb-init, run-docker-container.sh, and java all run as uid 0. The default S3PROXY_ENDPOINT=http://0.0.0.0:80 binds a privileged port. The run script creates JCLOUDS_FILESYSTEM_BASEDIR (default /data) at startup, which works only because root may create directories under /. Proposal Create a dedicated s3proxy user and group with a fixed, documented uid/gid and add a numeric USER <uid>:<gid> (numeric so Kubernetes runAsNonRoot validates without an explicit runAsUser). Change th

📅 Opened Jul 25, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Add support for creating traces for each storage (proxy) request and allow users to publish them to an OTel exporter.

📅 Opened May 10, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 15/100Contribute

Docker hub page seems to have some small issues on tag consistency. Images are not labeled as "latest" and no versioning is in place. Could use some automated tags based on release from github.

📅 Opened Apr 13, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for gaul/s3proxy

When evaluating whether to contribute to gaul/s3proxy, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of gaul/s3proxy acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 14 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to gaul/s3proxy

01

Is gaul/s3proxy welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

gaul/s3proxy has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~14 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.6 places gaul/s3proxy in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for gaul/s3proxy?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in gaul/s3proxy?

Yes, gaul/s3proxy currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for gaul/s3proxy are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.