fossasia/WPFAevent - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Wordpress Plugin for eventyay.com

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 59%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is fossasia/WPFAevent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

fossasia/WPFAevent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in fossasia/WPFAevent respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.3 places fossasia/WPFAevent in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for fossasia/WPFAevent?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for fossasia/WPFAevent is 58.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in fossasia/WPFAevent?

fossasia/WPFAevent currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

fossasia
fossasia/WPFAeventA•Welcoming825
GitHub
Back to Explorer
fossasia

fossasia/WPFAevent

825
InactiveA•Welcoming(60/100)PHP

Wordpress Plugin for eventyay.com

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.5/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in fossasia/WPFAevent. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
58.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
58.7%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe38/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for fossasia/WPFAevent
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/fossasia/WPFAevent)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/fossasia/WPFAevent?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Follow-up to #328 (fixes #325). Task: document the WordPress version dependency The fullscreen editor fix in admin/css/wpfaevent-admin.css targets block-editor internal class names: .edit-post-meta-boxes-main .edit-post-meta-boxes-main__liner .interface-interface-skeleton__content These are not a stable WordPress API and have been renamed in past releases. If they change again, the fullscreen bug from #325 will silently return. Extend the existing comment above these rules to say they were verified against WordPress 7.1, and link back to #325 so the reason for the rules is easy to trace. Acceptance criteria CSS comment mentions the WP version the selectors were verified on and references #325 No change in behaviour: fullscreen editor still works on the Event edit screen (Venue / Transportation / Hotel information) and the Speaker edit screen (Biography) Optional, not required for this issue Each rule is currently written once for .post-type-wpfa_event and once for .post-type-wpfa_s

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Bug Description Event Name: Visiting /speakers/?event=ev-6b901f56 The event name is not displayed in the hero, other events appear in the filter bar but the active event name is not visible Social Link Hover on Profile: On individual speaker profiles, hovering over social media links (Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) turns the text white on a white/transparent background, making it invisible. Steps to Reproduce Issue 1: Open /speakers/?event=ev-6b901f56. See that the event title is missing from the hero and no speakers load. Issue 2: Open any individual speaker page. Hover over the Twitter or LinkedIn button. See that the text disappears on hover. Expected Behavior /speakers/?event=<slug> should resolve the event, show the event name Speaker social links should retain high-contrast, legible text on hover. Actual Behavior Event name is not visible on/speakers/?event=.... Speaker social link text becomes invisible on hover. Screencast: Screencast.from.2026-09-20.06-

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Bug Description When updating an event's Description or Hero Lead Text via the frontend Edit Event modal on /events/, the modal form saves successfully. However, when visiting the event's main single page, the updated Hero Lead Text and Description are not displayed. This happens because the AJAX handler saves these values to post_excerpt and the post meta key wpfa_event_lead_text, but the single event template controller only checks post_content and an incompatible meta key _event_lead_text (with an underscore prefix). Steps to Reproduce Log in to WordPress as an administrator. Go to the events listing page at /events/. Click the Edit Details button on any event card to open the Edit Event modal. Modify the text in the Description field and the Hero Lead Text field. Click Save Changes (modal confirms the update and closes). Open the event's main single page (permalink). Notice the hero section and about section still show the old text instead of the newly saved text. Expected Beha

📅 Opened Sep 17, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description: When clicking the Edit Details button on an event card at /events/, the Edit Event modal dialog overflows the browser viewport vertically. Because the modal has a long form containing over 12 fields but lacks a max-height constraint and internal scrolling, flexbox vertical centering causes the modal to stretch off-screen in both directions. The modal header is cut off behind the top edge/admin bar. Additionally, the scrollbar for the modal's internal content (the div that is roughly 25% of the page width) is not positioned alongside that div. Instead, it appears on the far right side of the screen, detached from the modal container it controls. Steps to Reproduce Log in to WordPress as an administrator. Navigate to the events listing page at /events/. Locate any event card and click the Edit Details button. Observe the Edit Event popup modal that appears on screen. Expected Behavior The modal dialog should fit comfortably within the browser viewport with reasonable m

📅 Opened Sep 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description The PR title lint workflow in .github/workflows/lint-pr-title.yml is not working as expected. The workflow previously mentioned the contributor in a PR comment when the PR title failed the Conventional Commits validation. Currently, the GitHub Actions logs correctly show the PR title linting error, but the expected contributor comment is not being posted. An invalid PR title also results in a ❌ status at the end of the PR. The workflow uses amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v6 for validation and marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v3 for the PR comment. Expected Behavior Detect an invalid PR title. Comment on the PR mentioning the contributor with the linting error. Provide an example of the correct Conventional Commits format. Remove the warning comment once the title is fixed. Task Investigate why the contributor comment is no longer being posted and fix the workflow so that the PR title linting and notification work as intended. Reference file https://github.co

📅 Opened Aug 25, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more PHP beginner tasks?Explore PHP GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for fossasia/WPFAevent

When evaluating whether to contribute to fossasia/WPFAevent, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of fossasia/WPFAevent acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 58.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to fossasia/WPFAevent

01

Is fossasia/WPFAevent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

fossasia/WPFAevent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.3 places fossasia/WPFAevent in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for fossasia/WPFAevent?

The external pull request merge rate is 58.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in fossasia/WPFAevent?

Yes, fossasia/WPFAevent currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for fossasia/WPFAevent are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.