fossasia/WPFAevent - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Wordpress Plugin for FOSSASIA events website

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 57/100

External PR Merge Rate: 63%

Response Time: 8h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is fossasia/WPFAevent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

fossasia/WPFAevent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in fossasia/WPFAevent respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 8.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.5 places fossasia/WPFAevent in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for fossasia/WPFAevent?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for fossasia/WPFAevent is 63.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in fossasia/WPFAevent?

fossasia/WPFAevent currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

fossasia
fossasia/WPFAeventAWelcoming799
GitHub
Back to Explorer
fossasia

fossasia/WPFAevent

799
AWelcoming(57/100)PHP

Wordpress Plugin for FOSSASIA events website

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
8 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
8 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.2%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe79/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for fossasia/WPFAevent
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/fossasia/WPFAevent)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/fossasia/WPFAevent?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Description The PR title lint workflow in .github/workflows/lint-pr-title.yml is not working as expected. The workflow previously mentioned the contributor in a PR comment when the PR title failed the Conventional Commits validation. Currently, the GitHub Actions logs correctly show the PR title linting error, but the expected contributor comment is not being posted. An invalid PR title also results in a ❌ status at the end of the PR. The workflow uses amannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v6 for validation and marocchino/sticky-pull-request-comment@v3 for the PR comment. Expected Behavior Detect an invalid PR title. Comment on the PR mentioning the contributor with the linting error. Provide an example of the correct Conventional Commits format. Remove the warning comment once the title is fixed. Task Investigate why the contributor comment is no longer being posted and fix the workflow so that the PR title linting and notification work as intended. Reference file https://github.co

📅 Opened Aug 25, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description The calendar checks are currently implemented as a standalone PHP script and executed through a dedicated GitHub Actions workflow. They should be integrated into the existing PHPUnit unit test suite instead. Tasks Delete .github/workflows/calendar-test.yml and remove the dedicated calendar-test workflow. Move tests/calendar-test.php into tests/unit/. Convert the standalone assertions into proper PHPUnit test methods and extend WP_UnitTestCase as appropriate. Rename the test file/class according to the naming conventions documented in tests/README.md. Ensure the calendar tests are discovered and executed by the existing composer test / PHPUnit test suite. Remove standalone CLI-specific test scaffolding and assertions where they are no longer needed because the WordPress PHPUnit environment provides the required functionality. Keep coverage for calendar ICS generation, Google Calendar URL generation, timezone formatting, timed/all-day events, and invalid/missing event

📅 Opened Aug 24, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description Currently, newly created templates do not include a footer section. We already have a reusable footer component located at public/partials/footer.php. We need to integrate this partial into the template rendering logic so that whenever a user creates or views a template, both the header and the footer appear automatically. This will unify the layout and significantly improve the overall User Experience (UX). Expected Behavior When a template is rendered, the partials/footer.php file should be included at the bottom of the page. The layout should be consistent with how headers are currently implemented. Technical Tasks Locate the main template rendering view/controller. Include the partials/footer.php file at the end of the template layout. Verify that the footer renders correctly without breaking existing CSS/layouts. Ensure the footer displays properly across different user-created templates. Additional Context The footer partial is already built and located in th

📅 Opened Jun 11, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Description While investigating a recent commit, it was noted that git diff --check flagged trailing spaces in PHP files that should have been caught automatically by PHP_CodeSniffer (phpcs). Currently, developers have to manually run check commands or rely on Git to catch these spacing issues, which adds friction to the review workflow. We need to investigate why our phpcs configuration is failing to detect trailing whitespaces and fix it to automate this check. Expected Behavior Running phpcs should flag any trailing whitespaces in PHP files and block the build/CI pipeline if they are present. Actual Behavior phpcs passes successfully even when PHP files contain trailing spaces, forcing manual verification via git diff --check. Steps to Resolve Check the phpcs.xml configuration file to see which coding standard is being enforced. Verify if the Generic.Files.LineEndings or Squiz.WhiteSpace.SuperfluousWhitespace sniff is included and properly configured. Ensure that the trailing white

📅 Opened Jun 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Problem Description Currently, the main admin class inside admin/class-wpfaevent-admin.php handles multiple distinct structural tasks: registering global admin notices, enqueuing styles/scripts, processing settings pages, and managing custom post type (CPT) Meta Boxes (rendering inputs, processing schema arrays, verifying individual nonces, and updating post meta data). As the plugin evolves, bundling all CPT meta box logic directly inside this single file causes visual clutter, introduces code duplication, and scales poorly when introducing new metadata properties. Proposed Solution To maintain high readability and decouple our system architecture, we should extract the Meta Box presentation and data lifecycle routines away from the master admin file. Instead of adding more files to the root admin/ root directory, we should create a dedicated subdirectory inside admin/partials/ specifically for Meta Box handlers. Expected Structural Update Create a new subdirectory: admin/partials/me

📅 Opened Jun 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more PHP beginner tasks?Explore PHP GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for fossasia/WPFAevent

When evaluating whether to contribute to fossasia/WPFAevent, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of fossasia/WPFAevent acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 8 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to fossasia/WPFAevent

01

Is fossasia/WPFAevent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

fossasia/WPFAevent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~8 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.5 places fossasia/WPFAevent in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for fossasia/WPFAevent?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in fossasia/WPFAevent?

Yes, fossasia/WPFAevent currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for fossasia/WPFAevent are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.