finos/architecture-as-code - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

"Architecture as Code" (AasC) aims to devise and manage software architecture via a machine readable and version-controlled codebase, fostering a robust understanding, efficient development, and seamless maintenance of complex software architectures

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 79%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is finos/architecture-as-code welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

finos/architecture-as-code has a recorded first-timer success rate of 47.1%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in finos/architecture-as-code respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 47.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.2 places finos/architecture-as-code in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for finos/architecture-as-code?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for finos/architecture-as-code is 78.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in finos/architecture-as-code?

finos/architecture-as-code currently has 29 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

finos
finos/architecture-as-codeA•Welcoming418
GitHub
Back to Explorer
finos

finos/architecture-as-code

418
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)TypeScript

"Architecture as Code" (AasC) aims to devise and manage software architecture via a machine readable and version-controlled codebase, fostering a robust understanding, efficient development, and seamless maintenance of complex software architectures

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.5/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in finos/architecture-as-code. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
78.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
47.1%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
25 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
78.8%
Merge Gauge
47.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe46/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for finos/architecture-as-code
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/finos/architecture-as-code)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/finos/architecture-as-code?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Bug Report Steps to Reproduce: Build @calmstudio/diagram (calm-studio/packages/web-component). Call renderELKDiagram(arch, { flow: 'f' }) from dist/render.cjs, where arch has a flow that is valid for CALM 1.2: { "nodes": [ { "unique-id": "a", "node-type": "service", "name": "A", "description": "A" }, { "unique-id": "b", "node-type": "service", "name": "B", "description": "B" } ], "relationships": [ { "unique-id": "a-to-b", "relationship-type": { "connects": { "source": { "node": "a" }, "destination": { "node": "b" } } } } ], "flows": [ { "unique-id": "f", "name": "F", "description": "F", "transitions": [{ "relationship-unique-id": "a-to-b", "sequence-number": 1, "description": "A calls B" }] } ] } The same happens for <CalmDiagram src="..." flow="f" /> in the docs site. Expected Result: The diagram renders with the flow overlay. Each badge tooltip shows the transition description. Actual Result: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (readin

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Feature Proposal Target Project: calm-hub-ui, with small changes in calm-hub. Description of Feature: A node can point to a more detailed architecture with details.detailed-architecture. When that reference points to a document in the same CALM Hub instance, CALM Hub must open that document in the visualiser. This must work for every architecture in the Hub, and for every URL that users use to open the UI. Two parts of this are done: The UI drill-down, the breadcrumbs and the broken-reference view shipped in #2799 and #2841 (#2616). The user-facing API (#2653) makes $id equal to the canonical URL {calm.hub.base-url}/calm/namespaces/{ns}/{type}/{name}/versions/{version}. This issue covers the gaps that remain between the two. It supersedes #2581. User Stories: As an architect, I want to open the detailed architecture of a node in CALM Hub, so that I can move through a layered design without leaving the tool. As a platform owner, I want CALM Hub to identify its own documents by its co

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Feature Proposal Target Project: calm-lab Description of Feature: Replace the custom terminal in calm-lab/src/lab/Terminal.tsx with xterm.js, so that the lab shows real CLI output such as ANSI colour. This is item 2 of #3206. User Stories: As a learner, I want the lab terminal to look and act like a real terminal, so that what I learn transfers to the CLI on my machine. Current Limitations: Terminal.tsx is one input line with command history, tab completion and paste. It renders each output line as plain text, so it cannot show colour. Proposed Implementation: Use xterm.js. Lazy-load it, so the lab chunk stays small. Keep the TerminalProps contract with src/shell.ts (cwd, onRun, onComplete, chromeless), command history, tab completion and paste. Turn on the xterm.js screenReaderMode option. Screen readers can read the current terminal because it is plain DOM text. xterm.js output needs this option to give the same result. Keep the terminal readable in light and dark mode. Alternative

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Feature Proposal Target Project: calm-lab Description of Feature: Replace the <textarea> in calm-lab/src/lab/Editor.tsx with CodeMirror 6, with CALM schema autocomplete and inline validation errors. This is item 1 of #3206. User Stories: As a learner, I want autocomplete and inline errors in the editor, so that I learn the CALM schema while I type. Current Limitations: The editor is a <textarea> with a line-number gutter and a regex highlight overlay (tokenizeJson). It has no autocomplete, and validation errors show only in the terminal. Proposed Implementation: Use CodeMirror 6 with its JSON language package. Get autocomplete and errors from the CALM meta-schemas that the lab bundles (src/schemas.ts). Do not fetch schemas at run time. Lazy-load the editor, so the lab chunk stays small. Keep the EditorProps contract (value, dirty, onChange, onSave, chromeless), Cmd/Ctrl+S to save, Tab to indent, and light and dark mode. Alternatives Considered: Monaco. It is much larger, and the lab

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Bug Report Steps to Reproduce: Use the two documents from #3210: b.json adds a second ADR, changes the security control config-url, and changes the metadata owner. Run calm diff -a a.json -b b.json -f summary. Expected Result: The summary lists which ADRs and controls changed, the same way it lists node and relationship IDs under Nodes added: etc. Actual Result: Since #3213, the summary shows only counts: Nodes: +0 -0 ~0 ↔0 =1 Relationships: +0 -0 ~0 ↔0 =0 ADRs: +1 -0 =1 Controls: +0 -0 ~1 Metadata: +1 -1 ~0 A CI log shows that a control changed, but not which one. Environment: upstream/main (4d875eb), Node 26, macOS. Additional Context: Add ADRs added: / ADRs removed: (ADR content) and Controls added: / Controls removed: / Controls modified: (control IDs) lists in formatDiff in shared/src/commands/diff/diff-core.ts, after Relationships renamed:. Metadata items have no ID, so the count line is enough. Test gap: the diffDocuments cases in

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for finos/architecture-as-code

When evaluating whether to contribute to finos/architecture-as-code, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of finos/architecture-as-code acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 78.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to finos/architecture-as-code

01

Is finos/architecture-as-code welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

finos/architecture-as-code has a recorded first-timer success rate of 47.1%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.2 places finos/architecture-as-code in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for finos/architecture-as-code?

The external pull request merge rate is 78.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in finos/architecture-as-code?

Yes, finos/architecture-as-code currently has 29 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for finos/architecture-as-code are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.