falconry/falcon - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The no-magic web API and microservices framework for Python developers, with a focus on reliability and performance at scale.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 38%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is falconry/falcon welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

falconry/falcon has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in falconry/falcon respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.4 places falconry/falcon in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for falconry/falcon?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for falconry/falcon is 37.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in falconry/falcon?

falconry/falcon currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

falconry
falconry/falconA•Welcoming9.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
falconry

falconry/falcon

9,807
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(60/100)Python

The no-magic web API and microservices framework for Python developers, with a focus on reliability and performance at scale.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in falconry/falcon. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in falconry/falcon focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
37.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
23 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
37.5%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe25/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for falconry/falcon
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/falconry/falcon)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/falconry/falcon?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

See here: https://github.com/falconry/falcon/pull/2599/changes#r2716854330. Decorators like falcon.util.misc._lru_cache_* can be type using ParamSpec, allowing us to get rid of a bunch of typing ignores.

📅 Opened Apr 25, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Create a more advanced TypedDict or similar for annotating ASGI scope. We could probably draw inspiration from the relevant parts of asgiref: https://github.com/django/asgiref/blob/main/asgiref/typing.py. Since these annotations are really trivial, we probably want just to reimplement the part that we use. This would allow us to get rid of a bunch of typing ignores, see #2599.

📅 Opened Apr 25, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for falconry/falcon

When evaluating whether to contribute to falconry/falcon, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of falconry/falcon acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 37.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to falconry/falcon

01

Is falconry/falcon welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

falconry/falcon has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.4 places falconry/falcon in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for falconry/falcon?

The external pull request merge rate is 37.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in falconry/falcon?

Yes, falconry/falcon currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for falconry/falcon are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.