fail2ban/fail2ban - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple authentication errors

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 50/100

External PR Merge Rate: 53%

Response Time: 6h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is fail2ban/fail2ban welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

fail2ban/fail2ban has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in fail2ban/fail2ban respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 6.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 50.1 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 50.1 places fail2ban/fail2ban in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for fail2ban/fail2ban?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for fail2ban/fail2ban is 53.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in fail2ban/fail2ban?

fail2ban/fail2ban does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

fail2ban
fail2ban/fail2banBSolid18.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
fail2ban

fail2ban/fail2ban

18,508
BSolid(50/100)Python

Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple authentication errors

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in fail2ban/fail2ban welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
5 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
53.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
16 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
53.3%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe62/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for fail2ban/fail2ban
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/fail2ban/fail2ban)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/fail2ban/fail2ban?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for fail2ban/fail2ban.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for fail2ban/fail2ban

When evaluating whether to contribute to fail2ban/fail2ban, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of fail2ban/fail2ban acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 53.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to fail2ban/fail2ban

01

Is fail2ban/fail2ban welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

fail2ban/fail2ban has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 50.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 50.1 places fail2ban/fail2ban in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for fail2ban/fail2ban?

The external pull request merge rate is 53.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in fail2ban/fail2ban?

fail2ban/fail2ban does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for fail2ban/fail2ban are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.