facebook/astryx - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

An open source design system that's fully customizable and agent ready

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is facebook/astryx welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

facebook/astryx has a recorded first-timer success rate of 64.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in facebook/astryx respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 62.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.3 places facebook/astryx in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for facebook/astryx?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for facebook/astryx is 81.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in facebook/astryx?

facebook/astryx currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

facebook
facebook/astryxAWelcoming12.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
facebook

facebook/astryx

12,182
AWelcoming(64/100)TypeScript

An open source design system that's fully customizable and agent ready

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in facebook/astryx. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
64.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
30 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.2%
Merge Gauge
64.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe52/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for facebook/astryx
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/facebook/astryx)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/facebook/astryx?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

packages/cli/foundation/discovery/template-adapter.mjs decides whether a scaffolded asset is a video by reading its extension. An extension it does not recognise falls through to the image placeholder silently, so the failure points at "broken content" rather than erroring. Two ways in: DEMO_ASSET_PATTERN (:182) is /\/template-assets\/[\w-]+\.(\w+)/g — it reads the extension off the first dot, so clip.min.mp4 is judged on min VIDEO_EXTENSIONS (:169) has no m4v Measured on main: 150 /template-assets/ references, none with a second dot, none .m4v — neither path reaches anyone today. Filed for the silent fall-through itself, not for the two cases. Found by @AKnassa in #4839, which was closed as superseded by #4863.

📅 Opened Aug 24, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Problem A genuinely fresh worktree still cannot run pnpm -F @astryxdesign/storybook dev, even after #5100 fixed the @astryxdesign/richtext resolution. Storybook now fails earlier, on its own config load: Cannot find package '@astryxdesign/build/vite' imported from apps/storybook/.storybook/main.ts apps/storybook/.storybook/main.ts imports astryxStylex from @astryxdesign/build/vite, whose export map resolves to packages/build/dist/vite.mjs. That file does not exist until pnpm -F @astryxdesign/build build has run. Why a Vite alias cannot fix this one This is the Storybook config loader's node ESM resolution, not Vite's module graph — the failure happens while loading main.ts itself, before any resolve.alias from that file is in play. So the fix that worked for richtext (#5100) is structurally unavailable here. Noted as out of scope by @jiunshinn in #5100 and confirmed independently: the #5092 reporter's repro happened to have packages/build already compiled, which is why it surfaced r

📅 Opened Aug 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for facebook/astryx

When evaluating whether to contribute to facebook/astryx, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of facebook/astryx acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to facebook/astryx

01

Is facebook/astryx welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

facebook/astryx has a recorded first-timer success rate of 64.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.3 places facebook/astryx in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for facebook/astryx?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in facebook/astryx?

Yes, facebook/astryx currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for facebook/astryx are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.