eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Persistent memory for Claude Code and 6 other CLI agents, stored as plain markdown in your Obsidian vault. Stop re-explaining your projects, decisions and people every session. 45 commands: hybrid semantic search, self-rewriting notes, key-less web research, and scheduled agents that maintain the vault while you sleep.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 13/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 11d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 265.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 13.0 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 13.0 places eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain?

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

eugeniughelbur
eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brainD•Risky4.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
eugeniughelbur

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain

4,709
InactiveD•Risky(13/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Persistent memory for Claude Code and 6 other CLI agents, stored as plain markdown in your Obsidian vault. Stop re-explaining your projects, decisions and people every session. 45 commands: hybrid semantic search, self-rewriting notes, key-less web research, and scheduled agents that maintain the vault while you sleep.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
11 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Eight platform builds are compiled from one source tree. One person maintains all eight and can realistically test two of them. That is not a staffing complaint, it is the root cause of a specific class of bug here. Five separate findings from a recent audit turned out to be the same defect: a build that compiled cleanly, shipped, and was broken in a way only somebody who used that platform daily would notice. One cited a reference path that did not exist inside its own build, and it survived because the other copies were correct and nobody diffed them. So platform ownership is open. An owner is the person who would notice. What is open Updated 2026-09-26. adapters/OWNERS.md is the source of truth. Platform Status agent-skills unclaimed claude-code @born-in-autumn codex-cli @Palo-Alto-AI-Research-Lab gemini-cli unclaimed grok-bot unclaimed hermes unclaimed opencode unclaimed pi unclaimed What it involves Run the build on the real platform when something changes

📅 Opened Jul 26, 2026💬 24 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Every command carries trigger phrases in four languages, and adding a fifth needs no Python at all. Already shipped: English, Spanish, Portuguese, and Simplified Chinese. Please do not start another Chinese set. #176 is the worked reference for what a complete language looks like end to end. Each file in commands/ has frontmatter like this: triggers_en: ["capture this idea", "save this idea", "quick note", "drop a thought"] triggers_es: ["captura esta idea", "guarda esta idea", "nota rapida", "apunta esto"] triggers_pt: ["capture esta ideia", "salve esta ideia", "anotacao rapida", "registre um pensamento"] triggers_zh: ["记下这个想法", "帮我快速记一笔", "先把这个灵感存下来", "随手记一下"] (from commands/obsidian-capture.md, accents included in the real file) The dispatcher adapters discover triggers_<lang> keys by scanning the command files, so a new key makes all 46 commands reachable in that language with no other change. What to do Pick a language you act

📅 Opened Jul 26, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain

When evaluating whether to contribute to eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 11 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain

01

Is eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~11 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 13.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 13.0 places eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain?

Yes, eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.