erweixin/RaTeX - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

>99.5% KaTeX syntax coverage. LaTeX math renderer in pure Rust. No JavaScript, no WebView, no DOM. One Rust core → iOS, Android, Flutter, Web, PNG. C ABI · WASM · Server-side PNG/SVG.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 97%

Response Time: 1h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is erweixin/RaTeX welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

erweixin/RaTeX has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in erweixin/RaTeX respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.1 places erweixin/RaTeX in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for erweixin/RaTeX?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for erweixin/RaTeX is 96.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in erweixin/RaTeX?

erweixin/RaTeX currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

erweixin
erweixin/RaTeXA•Welcoming1.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
erweixin

erweixin/RaTeX

1,520
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(58/100)Rust

>99.5% KaTeX syntax coverage. LaTeX math renderer in pure Rust. No JavaScript, no WebView, no DOM. One Rust core → iOS, Android, Flutter, Web, PNG. C ABI · WASM · Server-side PNG/SVG.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in erweixin/RaTeX. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in erweixin/RaTeX focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
96.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
96.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe98/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for erweixin/RaTeX
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/erweixin/RaTeX)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/erweixin/RaTeX?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

I am wondering if you are interested in working on desktop native bindings: Windows: Renders RaTeX content to ID2D1DeviceContext. You may probably need two variants: Rust crate for Rust and C++ programs C# bindings for C# programs Macintosh: Renders to CG/CT, probably we can reuse existing iOS bindings Linux: Probably a Skia bindings or Cairo bindings

📅 Opened May 30, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for erweixin/RaTeX

When evaluating whether to contribute to erweixin/RaTeX, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of erweixin/RaTeX acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 96.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to erweixin/RaTeX

01

Is erweixin/RaTeX welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

erweixin/RaTeX has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.1 places erweixin/RaTeX in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for erweixin/RaTeX?

The external pull request merge rate is 96.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in erweixin/RaTeX?

Yes, erweixin/RaTeX currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for erweixin/RaTeX are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.