eric-tramel/moraine - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Unified realtime agent trace database & search MCP

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 96%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is eric-tramel/moraine welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eric-tramel/moraine has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in eric-tramel/moraine respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.4 places eric-tramel/moraine in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eric-tramel/moraine?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for eric-tramel/moraine is 95.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in eric-tramel/moraine?

eric-tramel/moraine currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

eric-tramel
eric-tramel/moraineA•Welcoming117
GitHub
Back to Explorer
eric-tramel

eric-tramel/moraine

117
InactiveA•Welcoming(65/100)Rust

Unified realtime agent trace database & search MCP

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in eric-tramel/moraine. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
95.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
95.8%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for eric-tramel/moraine
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/eric-tramel/moraine)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/eric-tramel/moraine?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Gap The Kimi reasoning branch in normalize_kimi_cli_wire_event maps ContentPart(type="think") to event_kind=reasoning / payload_type=thinking / has_reasoning=1. The in-tree fixture fixtures/kimi-cli/wire.jsonl exercises this path, and the unit test asserts the shape. But in the e2e run behind #268 against 6 real ~/.kimi/sessions, zero ContentPart records had type="think" — the reasoning path ran zero times against real data. This is plausible (the real sessions were short / didn't exercise Kimi's thinking mode), but it means: We've never verified end-to-end that reasoning rows render correctly in the monitor detail timeline for a Kimi session. If Kimi's ThinkPart payload shape diverges from what the fixture captures, we'd miss it until a user ingests a thinking-mode session. What to check Find or synthesize a Kimi session that actually uses thinking mode (enable it in Kimi CLI config; do a non-trivial coding task). Ingest through the sandbox e2e path. Verify in the monitor UI: ses

📅 Opened Apr 21, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for eric-tramel/moraine

When evaluating whether to contribute to eric-tramel/moraine, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of eric-tramel/moraine acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 95.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to eric-tramel/moraine

01

Is eric-tramel/moraine welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eric-tramel/moraine has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.4 places eric-tramel/moraine in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eric-tramel/moraine?

The external pull request merge rate is 95.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in eric-tramel/moraine?

Yes, eric-tramel/moraine currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for eric-tramel/moraine are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.