eljulians/skillfile - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

One-stop shop for AI skills and agents. Search 110K+ community skills, install and track them declaratively, and deploy across all major AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity and more)

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 92%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is eljulians/skillfile welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eljulians/skillfile has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in eljulians/skillfile respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 25.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.8 places eljulians/skillfile in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eljulians/skillfile?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for eljulians/skillfile is 91.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in eljulians/skillfile?

eljulians/skillfile currently has 42 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

eljulians
eljulians/skillfileA•Welcoming138
GitHub
Back to Explorer
eljulians

eljulians/skillfile

138
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(60/100)Rust

One-stop shop for AI skills and agents. Search 110K+ community skills, install and track them declaratively, and deploy across all major AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity and more)

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in eljulians/skillfile welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
91.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
91.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe78/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for eljulians/skillfile
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/eljulians/skillfile)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/eljulians/skillfile?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Component: crates/sources (sync.rs) | Severity: High | Status: Reproduced CLI help: "--dry-run - Show planned actions without fetching or installing". In reality only the unlocked cache-miss path checks dry_run; when a locked SHA short-circuits SHA resolution (or sha_cache supplies one), execution falls straight into fetch_store_github, downloading content and transactionally replacing the cache (content + .meta). A dry-run against a cache holding a newer sha than the lock even replaces it with older locked content. Where: crates/sources/src/sync.rs:515-521 (locked-sha return precedes the dry-run check at :528); :656-662 / :986-996 (fetch path has no dry-run guard). Repro (observed live): # locked github entry, then: rm -rf .skillfile/cache skillfile install --dry-run # output: "Syncing 1 entry [dry-run]... re-fetching (locked sha=...) ... -> ./.skillfile/cache/..." find .skillfile/cache -type f # .meta + content - cache recreated by a "dry" run Expected: no network I/O, no disk mut

📅 Opened Aug 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Component: crates/core (parser.rs) + SPEC.md | Severity: Low-Medium | Status: Code-traced (unit-replicable) SPEC §Quoting claims "POSIX shell quoting rules (shlex)" and §Inline Comments claims a # inside a quoted field is never a comment. The implementation: Only double quotes are recognized; single-quoted fields keep their quotes (then fail name validation or become literal path chars). strip_inline_comment runs AFTER quotes are stripped and drops any field that starts with # - so local skill x "#drafts/skill.md" loses the path field (treated as a comment), violating the SPEC rule. SPEC's own example line local skill "my skills/git commit.md" is rejected at parse time: the inferred name "git commit" contains a space → "invalid name … skipping". The spec example cannot work as written (explicit-name variants do). Where: crates/core/src/parser.rs:53-71 (split_line), :73-79 (strip_inline_comment), :36-41 + :342-359 (name validation applied to the inferred spaced name); SPEC.md §

📅 Opened Aug 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Component: crates/cli (format.rs) | Severity: Medium | Status: Reproduced Beyond the quoting corruption (separate issue), format loses content in a committed file: A standalone comment directly above an entry is preserved only if the raw entry line matches the regenerated canonical line; any spacing difference (single spaces, tabs) breaks the match and the comment is deleted. Inline comments (entry … # note) are always deleted. Lines with unknown first words - the SPEC's forward-compatibility mechanism ("old parsers warn and skip the line. No breakage") - are silently dropped, and the parse warnings that would have mentioned them are discarded by cmd_format. Where: crates/cli/src/commands/format.rs:85-106, :117-121 (comment matching keyed on raw line text), :182-185 (warnings discarded); serializer via :24-31. Repro: printf '# IMPORTANT: pinned on purpose\nlocal skill s skills/s.md\nfuturetype skill x extra\n' > Skillfile skillfile format cat Skillfile # comment gone (entry was s

📅 Opened Aug 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Component: crates/cli (config.rs) | Severity: Medium (settings data loss) | Status: Code-traced (unconditional path) read_config_from returns Config::default() on ANY parse error (reads degrade gracefully, so a TOML typo goes unnoticed). But every config write path (write_config_token, write_gitlab_config_token_to, write_user_targets_to) reads via the same function and rewrites the whole file from what it got - i.e. from an empty default. One skillfile init that saves a GitHub token replaces the user's config with only that token; their gitlab_token, gitlab_host, and all [[install]] entries are silently destroyed. write_config_to also uses plain fs::write (truncate-then-write), so a crash mid-write leaves a truncated file - which the next write then treats as empty (same wipe). Where: crates/cli/src/config.rs:161-166 (parse error → default), :224-237, :253-260, :146-158 (writers), :169-178 (non-atomic write). Repro: put gitlab_token = "x" plus a syntax error in ~/.config/skillfile/co

📅 Opened Aug 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Component: crates/deploy (paths.rs, install.rs) | Severity: High (forward-compat promise broken) | Status: Reproduced The project's own test suite documents that unknown adapters must be skipped gracefully ("lets new platform names be added to a Skillfile without breaking existing installs") and plain install does warn-and-skip. But the shared path helpers propagate adapter_for(target)? errors, so with install shiny-new-tool local present alongside install claude-code local: skillfile install --update exits 1 with "unknown adapter 'shiny-new-tool'" before syncing anything (via the auto-pin pass). skillfile info <name> exits 1 with the same error. skillfile status shows installed entries as [not installed] (per-target errors collapse the installed-path set) and silently disables drift detection. A teammate on a newer skillfile version adding a new platform to the shared manifest thus breaks older clients' core commands. Where: crates/deploy/src/paths.rs:45 and :80 (let adapter = adapt

📅 Opened Aug 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for eljulians/skillfile

When evaluating whether to contribute to eljulians/skillfile, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of eljulians/skillfile acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 91.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to eljulians/skillfile

01

Is eljulians/skillfile welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eljulians/skillfile has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.8 places eljulians/skillfile in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eljulians/skillfile?

The external pull request merge rate is 91.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in eljulians/skillfile?

Yes, eljulians/skillfile currently has 42 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for eljulians/skillfile are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.