eclipse-theia/theia - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Eclipse Theia is a cloud & desktop IDE framework implemented in TypeScript.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 80%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is eclipse-theia/theia welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eclipse-theia/theia has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in eclipse-theia/theia respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 59.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.4 places eclipse-theia/theia in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eclipse-theia/theia?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for eclipse-theia/theia is 80.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in eclipse-theia/theia?

eclipse-theia/theia currently has 11 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

eclipse-theia
eclipse-theia/theiaAWelcoming21.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
eclipse-theia

eclipse-theia/theia

21,630
AWelcoming(63/100)TypeScript

Eclipse Theia is a cloud & desktop IDE framework implemented in TypeScript.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.9/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in eclipse-theia/theia. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
35 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.0%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe56/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for eclipse-theia/theia
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/eclipse-theia/theia)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/eclipse-theia/theia?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Follow up of #17673 . With Theia dropping support for React 18, we should check where we can improve existing code by using new React 19 features or APIs.

📅 Opened Aug 26, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 35/100Contribute

Bug Description: On Linux, @parcel/watcher's inotify backend needs one watch per directory. The initial subscribe() walks the tree recursively, but a directory that appears later only gets a watch on itself (InotifyBackend::handleSubscription → watchDir, no scan of its contents). Anything already inside it at that moment never gets a watch for the rest of the backend's life — and that is the normal case for mkdir -p, git checkout, unzip/import or a tree renamed into the workspace, because the next level is created microseconds after its parent. Edits under such a subtree never reach editors, the navigator or language servers (didChangeWatchedFiles) until the backend restarts. No error, no log line. Upstream: parcel-bundler/watcher#97 (open since 2022, from microsoft/vscode#142694 — VS Code closed it as upstream and has no workaround; a window reload heals it) and parcel-bundler/watcher#243. It was noted when Theia moved from nsfw to parcel (#12784) but never tracked here. Measure

📅 Opened Aug 26, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Feature Description: Support native VS Code UX for the walkthroughs. This is a follow-up of #17309 For example, but not limited to: the walkthrough step content is inside the step card, not next to it right next to the step, there is optional media (SVG, PNG) to render responsive UI: when there is no horizontal space, do not render the media support inline codeblocks support markdown with referenced media VS Code native Mark Done button VS Code native colors for completed steps Actual: Expected: Screen.Recording.2026-08-25.at.10.43.52.mov

📅 Opened Aug 25, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

In @theia/bundle-plugin (observed in 1.73.1), the esbuild plugin replaces @vscode/ripgrep with a shim: export const rgPath = require("path").join(__dirname, './native/rg...'), copying the binary next to the bundle. In an electron-builder packaged app, the bundle typically lives inside app.asar. Electron redirects require() of .node files to app.asar.unpacked, but does not redirect child_process.spawn. The shim drops the asar → asar.unpacked handling that @vscode/ripgrep itself performs, so rgPath points inside the archive and every spawn fails — ENOENT on Windows, ENOTDIR on macOS — and file search silently returns 0 results. The .node files in the same directory keep working (require is redirected), which makes this asymmetry hard to diagnose. Suggested fix: emit the replacement in the shim, e.g. .replace(/\bapp\.asar([\\/])/, "app.asar.unpacked$1"), and/or document that packagers must add the copied native directory to asarUnpack. Downstream report with full diagnosis and measu

📅 Opened Jul 28, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Allow users to re-dock detached secondary windows into the main application window Problem Statement Currently, when a secondary window is detached from the main application, there is no dedicated way to dock it back. The only available option is to close the detached window using the X button. This behavior is unintuitive because users generally expect the X button to close the window completely rather than return it to the main application. As a result, users may hesitate to close the window or be unsure how to restore the original layout. User Need As a user, I want to re-dock a detached secondary window into the main application window without closing it, so that I can easily restore my preferred workspace. Proposed Solutions One or both of the following interaction patterns should be supported: Option 1: Re-dock Button Provide a dedicated "Dock" or "Return to Main Window" button in the title bar or toolbar of the detached window. Clicking the button docks the window back into its

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 65/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for eclipse-theia/theia

When evaluating whether to contribute to eclipse-theia/theia, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of eclipse-theia/theia acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to eclipse-theia/theia

01

Is eclipse-theia/theia welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

eclipse-theia/theia has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.4 places eclipse-theia/theia in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for eclipse-theia/theia?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in eclipse-theia/theia?

Yes, eclipse-theia/theia currently has 11 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for eclipse-theia/theia are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.