dyoshikawa/rulesync - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A Utility CLI for AI Coding Agents

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is dyoshikawa/rulesync welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

dyoshikawa/rulesync has a recorded first-timer success rate of 81.3%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in dyoshikawa/rulesync respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 65.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.7 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.7 places dyoshikawa/rulesync in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for dyoshikawa/rulesync?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for dyoshikawa/rulesync is 88.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in dyoshikawa/rulesync?

dyoshikawa/rulesync does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

dyoshikawa
dyoshikawa/rulesyncS•Elite1.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
dyoshikawa

dyoshikawa/rulesync

1,511
Active (30d)S•Elite(72/100)TypeScript

A Utility CLI for AI Coding Agents

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in dyoshikawa/rulesync. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
88.1%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
81.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
14 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
88.1%
Merge Gauge
81.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe60/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for dyoshikawa/rulesync
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/dyoshikawa/rulesync)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/dyoshikawa/rulesync?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Summary Please add support for Poolside as a generation target. Poolside's coding agent is pool — a single binary that runs an interactive TUI in the terminal and also acts as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) server, so it is driven from Zed, JetBrains, Neovim and other ACP-compatible editors as well as from the CLI. Repo: https://github.com/poolsideai/pool Docs: https://docs.poolside.ai (LLM doc index: https://docs.poolside.ai/llms.txt) CLI overview: https://docs.poolside.ai/cli/pool Install: https://docs.poolside.ai/cli/install Why Poolside exposes most of the primitives rulesync already fans out — rules, skills, MCP, subagents, hooks and permissions — and it does so on top of two conventions rulesync already handles: it reads AGENTS.md for instructions, and its skills follow the Agent Skills specification that rulesync's agentsskills target already enforces. So a fair amount of the plumbing exists. Being honest about demand: this is one user asking. I keep a single source of t

📅 Opened Sep 6, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

JSON.stringify(stripControlCharacters(x)) is now the way a remote-derived name reaches a log line, and it is spelled out at roughly 28 call sites across src/ — 20 of them in src/lib/fetch.ts after #2841. src/types/dir-feature-processor.ts additionally hoists it into quoted* locals, so two spellings of the same idiom coexist. The order matters and is not self-evident: the strip has to run first, because JSON.stringify escapes quotes and backslashes but not the C1 range or the bidi controls. That rationale currently lives in a comment at one call site. Suggested shape: export a quoteForLog(text: string): string from src/utils/control-characters.ts that does both, carry the ordering rationale in its doc comment, and replace the call sites with it. Mechanical, and it gives the convention one home to point at when the next log line is written. Found during the review of #2841.

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Background RulesyncMcp.getMcpServers() deliberately strips tool-specific keys so that a key meant for one target never leaks into another target's config. Targets that own one of those stripped keys therefore have to read it back off the unfiltered JSON, and three adapters now repeat the exact same lookup: src/features/mcp/codexcli-mcp.ts:562 — envVars, experimental_environment src/features/mcp/musecode-mcp.ts:320 — musecodeMode src/features/mcp/rovodev-mcp.ts:652 — rovodevEnableInstructions / enable_instructions Each one writes its own variant of: const rawMcpServers = rulesyncMcp.getJson().mcpServers; const rawServer = isRecord(rawMcpServers) && Object.hasOwn(rawMcpServers, name) ? rawMcpServers[name] : undefined; This was raised as a low finding during the review of #2793 and intentionally deferred there, because hoisting it would have touched codex and musecode, which are unrelated to the issue that PR closed (#2767). Proposal Add a single accessor on RulesyncMcp,

📅 Opened Aug 26, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for dyoshikawa/rulesync

When evaluating whether to contribute to dyoshikawa/rulesync, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of dyoshikawa/rulesync acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 88.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to dyoshikawa/rulesync

01

Is dyoshikawa/rulesync welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

dyoshikawa/rulesync has a recorded first-timer success rate of 81.3%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.7 places dyoshikawa/rulesync in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for dyoshikawa/rulesync?

The external pull request merge rate is 88.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in dyoshikawa/rulesync?

dyoshikawa/rulesync does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for dyoshikawa/rulesync are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.