🚧 Learn the craft of "DevOps" (Developer Operations) to Deploy your App and Monitor it so it stays "Up"!
C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 45/100
External PR Merge Rate: -
Response Time: -
First Timer Success: -
dwyl/learn-devops has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in dwyl/learn-devops respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 45.4 places dwyl/learn-devops in the B tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for dwyl/learn-devops is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
dwyl/learn-devops currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".
Growing Shell project in dwyl/learn-devops welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/dwyl/learn-devops?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
Historical health & responsiveness evolution
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 11:00 UTC (11:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Monday - Wednesday from 08:00 to 12:00 UTC (08:00 - 12:00 UTC local).
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~16 hours (81% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~115 hours (29% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
We've used NGINX extensively in the past nearly 2 decades. ⏳ 🤯 But I've been reading about traefik https://traefik.io/traefik and was considering using it for an upcoming project. googled for: nginx vs traefik google.com/search?q=traefik+vs+nginx to read about the key differences. Read: https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1hucr6c/traefik_vs_nginx_proxy_manager/ Now reading: https://caddyserver.com > https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy https://x.com/bwesterb/status/1708903488426512668 less config is good ... 💭 Going to spin it up on a test machine. 🧑💻
Researching which VPS service to use instead of Fly.io for the MVP, Auth and Hits apps (which keep crashing!). https://www.netcup.com/en/server/vps On the surface this is more expensive than OVH #64 (comment) But when you factor the price of Block Storage (i.e. NVMe attached to the VM), then Netcup becomes considerably more competitive. Hand't heard of them. But read that they support NetBSD via: https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/ui9z0m/digital_ocean_stops_supporting_bsds/ They don't directly support OpenBSD but they don't prevent it. There's a Networking Workaround article: https://www.netcup.com/en/helpcenter/documentation/server/connect-open-bsd My only "concern" with Netcup is their lack of availability zones: https://www.netcup.com/en/about-netcup/server-locations It's good that they have Singapore availability zone for Asia, but they charge literally double the price for it! 🙃 https://www.netcup.com/en/server/vps/vps-500-g12-iv-12m#vps-500-g12-iv-12m-sin And not
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to dwyl/learn-devops, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of dwyl/learn-devops acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
dwyl/learn-devops has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 45.4 places dwyl/learn-devops in the Solid tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
Yes, dwyl/learn-devops currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.
All metrics displayed for dwyl/learn-devops are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.