dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Powerful .NET library for benchmarking

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 7h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 7.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.9 places dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet is 83.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet?

dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

dotnet
dotnet/BenchmarkDotNetA•Welcoming11.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
dotnet

dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet

11,504
InactiveA•Welcoming(69/100)C#

Powerful .NET library for benchmarking

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Collaborative maintainer environment in dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
7 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
83.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
17 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
83.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe88/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Some modern CPUs have non heterogenous core configurations, meaning that some cores are faster than others. On x86 Intel is currently doing it, AMD does it in limited capacity on laptops while on Arm64 most CPUs have it AFAIR. This can result in wildly different timings between benchmark runs or even timing changes in the middle due to the OS moving the code to a different core. BDN should probably default to affinitizing the benchmark process to only "performance" cores, witha way to somehow opt out/force "efficiency" ones. On X86 the core types can be discovered with cpuid and information from CPU vendor manuals, no idea how to do it on arm64.

📅 Opened Sep 19, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

When building a project with $(SkipCompilerExecution) set to true, the CoreCompile target would invoke csc task but not actually execute the compiler. As a result, there's no output assembly being created at intermediate output location, causing the WeaveAssemblyTask in BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssemblies target to throw I think we should gate the BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssemblies target to run only if SkipCompilerExecution is not true. i.e. <Target Name="BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssemblies" AfterTargets="$(BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssembliesAfterTargets)" BeforeTargets="$(BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssembliesBeforeTargets)" --- Condition="'$(BenchmarkDotNetShouldWeaveAssemblies)' == 'true'" +++ Condition="'$(BenchmarkDotNetShouldWeaveAssemblies)' == 'true' and '$(SkipCompilerExecution )' != 'true'" Inputs="$(BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssemblyPath)" Outputs="$(BenchmarkDotNetWeaveAssembliesStampFile)">

📅 Opened Sep 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

On current version of BenchmarkDotNet implementation. --affinity command line argument is parsed as int (signed). So it can't accept value that over int.MaxValue value and it can't specify over 32-processor affinity. BenchmarkDotNet/src/BenchmarkDotNet/ConsoleArguments/CommandLineOptions.cs Line 67 in b515068 public int? Affinity { get; set; } I thought, it need to change affinity parameter to nuint (unsigned) to pass affinity as bit mask. Note: Currently BenchmarkDotNet seems not support CPU groups. So affinity can set up to 64 logical CPU cores. BenchmarkDotNet/src/BenchmarkDotNet/Extensions/ProcessExtensions.cs Lines 45 to 46 in b515068 // Max supported affinity without CPU groups is 64 long cpuMask = Environment.ProcessorCount >= 64 ? un

📅 Opened Aug 14, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet

When evaluating whether to contribute to dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 7 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 83.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet

01

Is dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~7 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.9 places dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet?

The external pull request merge rate is 83.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet?

Yes, dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.