docling-project/docling - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Get your documents ready for gen AI

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 65%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is docling-project/docling welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

docling-project/docling has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.2%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in docling-project/docling respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 27.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.4 places docling-project/docling in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for docling-project/docling?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for docling-project/docling is 64.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in docling-project/docling?

docling-project/docling currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

docling-project
docling-project/doclingAWelcoming65.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
docling-project

docling-project/docling

65,736
AWelcoming(60/100)Python

Get your documents ready for gen AI

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.1/10
Patience Score
7.6/10
Nitpick Rate
36%

Balanced & professional review environment in docling-project/docling. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
64.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.2%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
64 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
64.8%
Merge Gauge
66.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for docling-project/docling
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/docling-project/docling)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/docling-project/docling?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Background JATS (Journal Article Tag Suite) is a standardized XML format used to encode, publish, and archive academic and scientific literature. It provides a common set of tags to structure article text, metadata (like authors and affiliations), figures, and citations, allowing research to be shared seamlessly across platforms like PubMed, CrossRef, and SciELO. Docling supports the parsing of JATS through the declarative backend JatsDocumentBackend. The first version was released with version 2.23.0 on Feb 17, 2025. Since then, the DoclingDocument data model has evolved and it now supports features that rich JATS document contain but had to be ignored in the first version. Goal The goal of this issue is to review the JATS backend and implement the parsing of features in JATS documents that can currently be support with DoclingDocument. Some of these features were marked as TODO in the code and thus they should be easy to locate and implement. They include: Footnotes @aaarif796 #3

📅 Opened Jun 11, 2026💬 12 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Requested feature Currently, footnotes are serialized as part of MarkdownDocSerializer more or less as-is: Serialized as: 5 https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract 6 https://github.com/VikParuchuri/surya 7 https://github.com/lukas-blecher/LaTeX-OCR Alternatives For downstream LLM-based applications it would be helpful if footnotes were serialized as actual footnotes in Markdown Syntax for the LLM to indentify them as footnotes (and not as a numbered list, for example). ^[5 https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract] ^[6 https://github.com/VikParuchuri/surya] ^[7 https://github.com/lukas-blecher/LaTeX-OCR]

📅 Opened Mar 14, 2026💬 13 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Problem When using ImageRefMode.REFERENCED, users must manually: Iterate through all picture elements Save each image to disk Update the URI for each element Then call export_to_markdown() Proposed Solution Add optional image_dir and image_path_prefix parameters to export methods: markdown = doc.export_to_markdown( image_mode=ImageRefMode.REFERENCED, image_dir=Path("./output/images"), image_path_prefix="images/" # relative path in markdown output ) When image_dir is provided: Automatically save images to that directory Generate sequential filenames (e.g. image_001.png) Use image_path_prefix in the markdown output Affected Methods DoclingDocument.export_to_markdown() PictureItem.export_to_markdown() Potentially HTML export methods too Would this be an interesting feature to have? Happy to submit a PR. (PS: Keep up the great work!!)

📅 Opened Mar 10, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

all work fine so fare but image count like i mentiont and same(similar) for tables yes you can convert tables in markdown directly but if you make a json <b<much better for embedding you have trouble to find the right place copy back to markdown. i made out of the json tables in json format tables_data = [] for table_ix, table in enumerate(conv_res.document.tables): if not hasattr(table, 'export_to_dataframe'): _log.warning(f"Table {table_ix} has no export method.") continue try: # Assuming clean_text is defined globally or passed in. # If missing, you must define it or use str(val).replace('\n', ' ') table_df = table.export_to_dataframe() num_rows = len(table_df) if hasattr(table_df, 'columns'): columns_list = list(table_df.columns) records = [ {col: clea

📅 Opened Mar 7, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Bug In docling-core, the MarkdownTableSerializer transforms DoclingDocument headings and titles into markdown headings (i.e., text with preceding # symbols). According to the markdown specs, you can’t use headings, blockquotes, lists, horizontal rules, images, or most HTML tags when formatting text within tables and most applications will not render those headings properly. Steps to reproduce Convert Docling's test file table_with_heading_02.html to markdown or check its ground truth file table_with_heading_02.html.md Docling version Docling version: 2.64.0 Docling Core version: 2.51.1 Docling IBM Models version: 3.10.2 Docling Parse version: 4.7.1 Python: cpython-313 (3.13.5) Platform: macOS-14.7.1-arm64-arm-64bit-Mach-O Python version Python 3.13.5

📅 Opened Dec 4, 2025💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for docling-project/docling

When evaluating whether to contribute to docling-project/docling, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of docling-project/docling acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 64.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to docling-project/docling

01

Is docling-project/docling welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

docling-project/docling has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.2%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.4 places docling-project/docling in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for docling-project/docling?

The external pull request merge rate is 64.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in docling-project/docling?

Yes, docling-project/docling currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for docling-project/docling are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.