docling-project/docling - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Get your documents ready for gen AI

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 61%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is docling-project/docling welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

docling-project/docling has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in docling-project/docling respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 67.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 67.4 places docling-project/docling in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for docling-project/docling?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for docling-project/docling is 60.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in docling-project/docling?

docling-project/docling currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

docling-project
docling-project/doclingA•Welcoming68.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
docling-project

docling-project/docling

68,619
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)Python

Get your documents ready for gen AI

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.1/10
Patience Score
7.6/10
Nitpick Rate
36%

Balanced & professional review environment in docling-project/docling. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
60.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
117 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
60.7%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe44/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for docling-project/docling
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/docling-project/docling)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/docling-project/docling?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Type: Bug (silent content loss; low priority, no real document found with this construct) Component: docling/backend/msword_backend.py (body walk over body.iterchildren()) Environment: docling 2.133.0 / docling-core 2.99.0 / python-docx 1.2.0 / Windows 11 Context & Description <mc:AlternateContent> carries <mc:Choice Requires="..."> (modern markup) and <mc:Fallback> (legacy markup). When it is a direct child of w:body, the main body walk does not descend into it, so every paragraph in the supported Choice branch is lost. Evidence repro/min_alternate_content.docx is a copy of the docling.rs test fixture alternate_content_body.docx (a hand-written Markup Compatibility test file, not a Word output; Word flattens a body-level mc:AlternateContent when it saves, so the construct comes from third-party generators). Result on docling 2.133.0: only the paragraphs before and after survive. Element Python docling 2.133.0 Paragraph before AlternateContent present CHOICE_BRANCH_ACTIVE mis

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Type: Bug (silent text loss, document mutated by a read-only export) Component: docling_core/types/doc/document.py, DoclingDocument.validate_misplaced_list_items Environment: docling 2.133.0 / docling-core 2.99.0 / Python 3.14 / Windows 11 Context & Description A list item made of several formatted runs is stored as a ListItem with empty text and one TextItem child per run (under an inline group). When such an item has no ListGroup parent, the model validator validate_misplaced_list_items re-wraps it: it calls delete_items(...) (which removes the item and its subtree) and then add_list_item(text=li.text, ...). Only text, marker, formatting, hyperlink and provenance are passed, never the children. For a multi-run item li.text is "", so the item is re-created empty and its content is gone. The effect is visible only after an export: convert() returns 8 texts, export_to_markdown() / export_to_html() reduce doc.texts to 5 in place and their output lacks the second item. Order matters: exp

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Background JATS (Journal Article Tag Suite) is a standardized XML format used to encode, publish, and archive academic and scientific literature. It provides a common set of tags to structure article text, metadata (like authors and affiliations), figures, and citations, allowing research to be shared seamlessly across platforms like PubMed, CrossRef, and SciELO. Docling supports the parsing of JATS through the declarative backend JatsDocumentBackend. The first version was released with version 2.23.0 on Feb 17, 2025. Since then, the DoclingDocument data model has evolved and it now supports features that rich JATS document contain but had to be ignored in the first version. Goal The goal of this issue is to review the JATS backend and implement the parsing of features in JATS documents that can currently be support with DoclingDocument. Some of these features were marked as TODO in the code and thus they should be easy to locate and implement. They include: Footnotes @aaarif796 #3

📅 Opened Jun 11, 2026💬 15 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Requested feature Currently, footnotes are serialized as part of MarkdownDocSerializer more or less as-is: Serialized as: 5 https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract 6 https://github.com/VikParuchuri/surya 7 https://github.com/lukas-blecher/LaTeX-OCR Alternatives For downstream LLM-based applications it would be helpful if footnotes were serialized as actual footnotes in Markdown Syntax for the LLM to indentify them as footnotes (and not as a numbered list, for example). ^[5 https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract] ^[6 https://github.com/VikParuchuri/surya] ^[7 https://github.com/lukas-blecher/LaTeX-OCR]

📅 Opened Mar 14, 2026💬 13 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Problem When using ImageRefMode.REFERENCED, users must manually: Iterate through all picture elements Save each image to disk Update the URI for each element Then call export_to_markdown() Proposed Solution Add optional image_dir and image_path_prefix parameters to export methods: markdown = doc.export_to_markdown( image_mode=ImageRefMode.REFERENCED, image_dir=Path("./output/images"), image_path_prefix="images/" # relative path in markdown output ) When image_dir is provided: Automatically save images to that directory Generate sequential filenames (e.g. image_001.png) Use image_path_prefix in the markdown output Affected Methods DoclingDocument.export_to_markdown() PictureItem.export_to_markdown() Potentially HTML export methods too Would this be an interesting feature to have? Happy to submit a PR. (PS: Keep up the great work!!)

📅 Opened Mar 9, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for docling-project/docling

When evaluating whether to contribute to docling-project/docling, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of docling-project/docling acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 60.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to docling-project/docling

01

Is docling-project/docling welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

docling-project/docling has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 67.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 67.4 places docling-project/docling in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for docling-project/docling?

The external pull request merge rate is 60.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in docling-project/docling?

Yes, docling-project/docling currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for docling-project/docling are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.