davesnx/styled-ppx - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

styled components for Reason/OCaml with type-safe CSS and static extraction

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 45/100

External PR Merge Rate: 12%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is davesnx/styled-ppx welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

davesnx/styled-ppx has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in davesnx/styled-ppx respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 44.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 44.8 places davesnx/styled-ppx in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for davesnx/styled-ppx?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for davesnx/styled-ppx is 11.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in davesnx/styled-ppx?

davesnx/styled-ppx currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

davesnx
davesnx/styled-ppxB•Solid415
GitHub
Back to Explorer
davesnx

davesnx/styled-ppx

415
InactiveB•Solid(45/100)OCOCaml

styled components for Reason/OCaml with type-safe CSS and static extraction

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
26%

Balanced & professional review environment in davesnx/styled-ppx. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
11.5%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
11.5%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe35/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for davesnx/styled-ppx
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/davesnx/styled-ppx)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/davesnx/styled-ppx?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

What to build The generated coverage report (packages/css-grammar/data/coverage.md, make css-oracle) lists 185 missing standard properties, 47 legacy aliases, and 80 missing functions, each with its spec id and value-definition syntax. This is the umbrella issue for burning that list down. Work through it by spec module (e.g. css-borders-4, css-overflow-4, css-rhythm-1), not property-by-property, so shared value types land once. A contributor guide describing the end-to-end recipe for adding a property (spec dialect, runtime witnesses, testing, oracle regeneration) lives at documents/adding-css-properties.md. Important caveats: The syntax strings in the report come from the specs and are not paste-ready: styled-ppx's spec dialect diverges (interpolation alternatives, runtime witnesses in the hand-maintained type modules). Auto-generation of specs has been evaluated and rejected. Every addition must update the coverage report (make css-oracle) — CI gates on staleness. Acceptance cri

📅 Opened Jul 21, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more OCaml beginner tasks?Explore OCaml GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for davesnx/styled-ppx

When evaluating whether to contribute to davesnx/styled-ppx, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of davesnx/styled-ppx acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 11.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to davesnx/styled-ppx

01

Is davesnx/styled-ppx welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

davesnx/styled-ppx has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 44.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 44.8 places davesnx/styled-ppx in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for davesnx/styled-ppx?

The external pull request merge rate is 11.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in davesnx/styled-ppx?

Yes, davesnx/styled-ppx currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for davesnx/styled-ppx are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.