datacontract/datacontract-cli - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open-source data contract testing for Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Kafka & 15 more. Built on the Open Data Contract Standard (ODCS). MIT.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 68/100

External PR Merge Rate: 77%

Response Time: 15h

First Timer Success: 57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is datacontract/datacontract-cli welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

datacontract/datacontract-cli has a recorded first-timer success rate of 56.5%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in datacontract/datacontract-cli respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 15.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.4 places datacontract/datacontract-cli in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for datacontract/datacontract-cli?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for datacontract/datacontract-cli is 77.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in datacontract/datacontract-cli?

datacontract/datacontract-cli does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

datacontract
datacontract/datacontract-cliA•Welcoming1.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
datacontract

datacontract/datacontract-cli

1,084
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(68/100)JavaScript

Open-source data contract testing for Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Kafka & 15 more. Built on the Open Data Contract Standard (ODCS). MIT.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in datacontract/datacontract-cli. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
15 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
77.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
56.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
19 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
77.2%
Merge Gauge
56.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe66/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for datacontract/datacontract-cli
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/datacontract/datacontract-cli)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/datacontract/datacontract-cli?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

(I hit this problem and asked Gemini to generate the bug report - so written by AI, but I've reviewed and it's got all the right info IMHO.) Title: ClickHouse SQL export does not escape apostrophes in column comments Bug report: Using Data Contract CLI 1.2.4, a valid contract with an apostrophe in a property description generates invalid ClickHouse SQL. Minimal reproduction (datacontract.yaml): apiVersion: v3.2.0 kind: DataContract id: urn:datacontract:quote-repro name: quote-repro version: 1.0.0 status: active schema: - name: example properties: - name: id logicalType: string required: true primaryKey: true - name: amount logicalType: number description: The extractor's amount. Run: datacontract lint datacontract.yaml datacontract export sql datacontract.yaml --dialect clickhouse --clickhouse-engine MergeTree Lint passes, but the export contains: `amount` Nullable(Decimal(38,0)) COMMENT 'The extractor's amount.' The apostrophe

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

When running the datacontract test command, only the result of the first test is displayed (I noticed this during the freshness checks). From the second test onwards, the result is always NULL. Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something? Datacontract Example slaProperties: slaProperties: id: monitoring_airflow_dag_task_contract_freshness property: freshness value: 4 unit: hour element: monitoring_airflow_dag_task_contract.dag_run_start_date description: The DAG metadata history must be up to date within 4 hours. id: monitoring_data_contract_check_freshness property: freshness value: 4 unit: hour element: monitoring_data_contract_check.check_timestamp description: The most recent execution of a Data Contract Check must not be more than 4 hours old. Output datacontract cli: ╭────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

📅 Opened Aug 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 65/100Contribute

process_s3_file (datacontract/engines/fastjsonschema/check_jsonschema.py:202-217) validates only the last object matched by the location glob. Every other file is downloaded and then discarded unvalidated, so an invalid record in any file but the last goes unreported and the run still appends the passed check "All JSON entries are valid." for the model. Cause: the loop body only assigns a lazy generator over the current file's content to json_stream, overwriting the previous file's generator before anything consumes it; validate_json_stream is then called once, after the loop. Applies whenever location matches more than one object — e.g. the documented s3://my-bucket/orders/*.json, or a {model} pattern expanding onto several files. Secondary effect: the full dataset is downloaded (and paid for in egress) even though only one file is checked. Fix direction: validate inside the loop and accumulate the exceptions across files. Where to start: the fix is in process_s3_file — call valid

📅 Opened Aug 14, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Dear team, I've noticed that when exporting an ODCS schema to avro or jsonschema, it uses the name of the objects and properties and ignores the physicalName. Commands used: datacontract export jsonschema --output jsonschema.json datacontract.yaml datacontract export avro --output avro.json datacontract.yaml ODCS Property: - name: Equipment Name physicalName: name logicalType: string description: Equipment name based on the ISA-95 model Result (avro): { "name": "Equipment Name", "doc": "Equipment name based on the ISA-95 model", "type": "string" }, Expected result: { "name": "name", "doc": "Equipment name based on the ISA-95 model", "type": "string" }, This problem extends to any datacontract test that checks a JSON using the json schema (e.g., when testing an HTTP API).

📅 Opened Aug 11, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more JavaScript beginner tasks?Explore JavaScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for datacontract/datacontract-cli

When evaluating whether to contribute to datacontract/datacontract-cli, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of datacontract/datacontract-cli acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 15 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 77.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to datacontract/datacontract-cli

01

Is datacontract/datacontract-cli welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

datacontract/datacontract-cli has a recorded first-timer success rate of 56.5%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~15 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.4 places datacontract/datacontract-cli in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for datacontract/datacontract-cli?

The external pull request merge rate is 77.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in datacontract/datacontract-cli?

datacontract/datacontract-cli does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for datacontract/datacontract-cli are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.