databrickslabs/dqx - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Databricks framework to validate Data Quality of pySpark DataFrames and Tables

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 36%

Response Time: 3h

First Timer Success: 20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is databrickslabs/dqx welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

databrickslabs/dqx has a recorded first-timer success rate of 20.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in databrickslabs/dqx respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 2.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.4 places databrickslabs/dqx in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for databrickslabs/dqx?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for databrickslabs/dqx is 35.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in databrickslabs/dqx?

databrickslabs/dqx currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

databrickslabs
databrickslabs/dqxA•Welcoming463
GitHub
Back to Explorer
databrickslabs

databrickslabs/dqx

463
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(60/100)Python

Databricks framework to validate Data Quality of pySpark DataFrames and Tables

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in databrickslabs/dqx. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in databrickslabs/dqx focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Run the repository formatter and linter locally

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
Response Velocity
2 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
35.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
20.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
22 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
35.7%
Merge Gauge
20.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe48/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for databrickslabs/dqx
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/databrickslabs/dqx)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/databrickslabs/dqx?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Is there an existing issue for this? I have searched the existing issues Problem statement Validation is_unique can potentially evaluate 123 and 123 even though they are from functional perspective the same value. Proposed Solution Add optional trim_strings parameter. Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Is there an existing issue for this? I have searched the existing issues Problem statement No simple way to collect end-user feedback apart from GitHub issues. Proposed Solution General Feedback - Google Form? Embedded in the DQX Website. Report Bug --> Github Issues Feature Request --> Github Feature Request Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Sep 8, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Raising the mlflow[databricks] floor to >=3.13.0 (in #1489, to pick up mlflow/mlflow#20599) left two pieces of scaffolding behind that no supported version needs any more. Both are small and self-contained. 1. The artifact_path= fallback in log_sklearn_model_compatible is dead src/databricks/labs/dqx/anomaly/mlflow_registry.py inspects mlflow.sklearn.log_model and prefers name= when the signature offers it, falling back to artifact_path= when it does not. MLflow 3.x accepts both, so the name= branch is always taken and the fallback is unreachable on any version the floor admits. Worth keeping the helper's shape if it is doing other work, but the dead branch and its comment can go. 2. The dummy Databricks config profile fixture is probably removable tests/integration_anomaly/conftest.py::_ensure_databricks_config_file writes a config profile with token = dummy purely to work around mlflow/mlflow#20599, which the new floor contains. This one cannot be settled from CI: CI always supplies

📅 Opened Sep 4, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Is there an existing issue for this? I have searched the existing issues Problem statement The currently list of metrics is limited to basics such as min, max, stdev etc. Proposed Solution Include additional statistics beyond minimum and maximum values, such as the 10th percentile, along with the percentage of occurrences within each bucket or range. Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Mar 12, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for databrickslabs/dqx

When evaluating whether to contribute to databrickslabs/dqx, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of databrickslabs/dqx acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 35.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to databrickslabs/dqx

01

Is databrickslabs/dqx welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

databrickslabs/dqx has a recorded first-timer success rate of 20.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.4 places databrickslabs/dqx in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for databrickslabs/dqx?

The external pull request merge rate is 35.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in databrickslabs/dqx?

Yes, databrickslabs/dqx currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for databrickslabs/dqx are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.