daisy/MathCAT - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

MathCAT: Math Capable Assistive Technology for generating speech, braille, and navigation.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 59%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is daisy/MathCAT welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

daisy/MathCAT has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in daisy/MathCAT respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 41.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.0 places daisy/MathCAT in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for daisy/MathCAT?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for daisy/MathCAT is 58.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in daisy/MathCAT?

daisy/MathCAT currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

daisy
daisy/MathCATA•Welcoming120
GitHub
Back to Explorer
daisy

daisy/MathCAT

120
InactiveA•Welcoming(59/100)Rust

MathCAT: Math Capable Assistive Technology for generating speech, braille, and navigation.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Rust project in daisy/MathCAT welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Rust style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • •Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
58.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
16 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
58.8%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe39/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for daisy/MathCAT
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/daisy/MathCAT)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/daisy/MathCAT?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

in cargo.toml, the [[package]] block still contains: repository = "https://github.com/NSoiffer/MathCAT" homepage = "https://nsoiffer.github.io/MathCAT/" documentation = "https://nsoiffer.github.io/MathCAT/" this should be replaced with the respective DAISY URLs. Open question: which other places also need some cleanup like this?

📅 Opened Aug 28, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

The logo needs to be added/designed for the following (sub) document pages: AT users: information about preferences you can set AT developers/library users: information about the API that MathCAT exposes Translators/Rule writers: information about the files that need to be translated MathCAT developers: information about development workflow and testing Note: this is not #406.: the logo exists but it is either not present or not really designed properly for these pages.

📅 Opened Aug 28, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

In some area, people use $\overset{\rightharpoonup}{OA}$ to denote a vector from point O to point A. In all area, people use $\overline{OA}$ to denote a line segment from point O to point A. In Intent/geometry.yaml, there is already a rule geometry-line-segment(mover) for line segment: - name: geometry-line-segment tag: mover match: - "*[2][self::m:mo][.='¯'] and" - "*[1][self::m:mrow][count(*)=3 and " - " *[1][self::m:mi and string-length(text()) and translate(., 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ', '') = ''] and" - " *[2][self::m:mo and (.='\u2062' or .='\u2063')] and" - " *[3][self::m:mi and string-length(text()) and translate(., 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ', '') = '']" - " ]" replace: - intent: name: "line-segment" attrs: "data-intent-property='concat(data-intent-property, \":prefix:\")'" children: - x: "*[1]/*[1]" - x: "*[1]/*[3]" hope MathCAT can add new rule geometry-harpoonvector(mover) for

📅 Opened Jul 1, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute

As reported by @jrbowden ICEB has published some updated guidelines on choice and placement of grade 1 indicators. This guidance brings more consistency in the way mathematical expressions are rendered in UEB. You can find the document at https://iceb.org/publications/ueb/ under the heading Revisions to Guidelines for Technical Material.

📅 Opened Mar 25, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for daisy/MathCAT

When evaluating whether to contribute to daisy/MathCAT, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of daisy/MathCAT acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 58.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to daisy/MathCAT

01

Is daisy/MathCAT welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

daisy/MathCAT has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.0 places daisy/MathCAT in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for daisy/MathCAT?

The external pull request merge rate is 58.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in daisy/MathCAT?

Yes, daisy/MathCAT currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for daisy/MathCAT are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.