crytic/echidna - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Ethereum smart contract fuzzer

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 61/100

External PR Merge Rate: 62%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is crytic/echidna welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

crytic/echidna has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in crytic/echidna respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.9 places crytic/echidna in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for crytic/echidna?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for crytic/echidna is 61.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in crytic/echidna?

crytic/echidna does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

crytic
crytic/echidnaA•Welcoming3.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
crytic

crytic/echidna

3,185
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(61/100)HAHaskell

Ethereum smart contract fuzzer

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in crytic/echidna. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
61.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
61.5%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for crytic/echidna
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/crytic/echidna)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/crytic/echidna?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for crytic/echidna.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Haskell beginner tasks?Explore Haskell GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for crytic/echidna

When evaluating whether to contribute to crytic/echidna, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of crytic/echidna acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 61.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to crytic/echidna

01

Is crytic/echidna welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

crytic/echidna has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.9 places crytic/echidna in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for crytic/echidna?

The external pull request merge rate is 61.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in crytic/echidna?

crytic/echidna does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for crytic/echidna are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.