cristicretu/diri - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The best way to work with coding agents. Run fifty in parallel, let them spawn each other, review everything in one place.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 56%

Response Time: 10h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is cristicretu/diri welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

cristicretu/diri has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in cristicretu/diri respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 10.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.5 places cristicretu/diri in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for cristicretu/diri?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for cristicretu/diri is 56.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in cristicretu/diri?

cristicretu/diri currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

cristicretu
cristicretu/diriA•Welcoming431
GitHub
Back to Explorer
cristicretu

cristicretu/diri

431
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)Rust

The best way to work with coding agents. Run fifty in parallel, let them spawn each other, review everything in one place.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in cristicretu/diri. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
10 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
56.4%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
4 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
56.4%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe60/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for cristicretu/diri
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/cristicretu/diri)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/cristicretu/diri?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Problem Aider's bundled manifest documents several subtle prompt boundaries, but the Rust tree has no Aider-specific screen-rule regression tests. Launch/resume coverage does not protect status detection from false positives. Scope Add focused tests for the existing Aider rules. Use small synthetic terminal screens based on the examples documented in the manifest; label them as synthetic examples, not live captures. No Aider installation, model account, or network access should be required. Start with: diri/crates/diri-engine/manifests/aider.json: confirm-prompt, working-spinner, and idle-prompt. diri/crates/diri-engine/src/detect/mod.rs and detect/manifest.rs: reuse the existing screen/rule test helpers. Acceptance An unanswered (Y)es/(N)o [Yes]: prompt matches the permission rule. An answered prompt ending in : y followed by the working spinner does not remain blocked. Bare > and ask> bottom-row prompts match idle. ->, -->, and a quoted prompt above a non-prompt last row do not ma

📅 Opened Sep 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem In Settings → Skills, opening a skill and choosing Copy instructions writes to the clipboard but gives no confirmation. Keyboard activation has the same behavior, so it is hard to tell whether the copy happened. Scope Give the existing button brief “Copied” feedback after a successful copy. Reuse the current control; no toast, new setting, or dependency is needed. Start in diri/crates/diri-app/src/skills_page.rs. Both the click callback for skills-copy and the detail-view branch of handle_key currently call write_to_clipboard directly. They should share the copy action. Acceptance Pointer, Enter, and Space activation show the same confirmation. The control keeps its width and keyboard focus while its label changes. Repeated copies restart the feedback interval; navigating to another skill clears stale feedback. An unreadable or still-loading skill never reports a successful copy. Include a short recording of mouse and keyboard behavior; keep motion consistent with the ex

📅 Opened Sep 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem dirijor session spawn --help currently exits with “session spawn requires an agent kind”. The top-level help lists the command but does not explain its arguments. A first-time CLI user has to read the source to discover --cwd, --worktree, --branch, and --prompt. Scope Add command-specific help for dirijor session spawn --help and -h. Keep this PR limited to spawn help; no command parser rewrite or new dependency is needed. Start in diri/crates/dirijor-mcp/src/bin/dirijor.rs: run, session, and session_spawn. Acceptance Help exits successfully and prints usage, supported arguments, and one local example. It works without a running Engine and never opens a connection, starts a session, or creates a worktree. Ordinary spawning and missing-argument errors keep their current behavior. Add focused tests for both help flags and the no-Engine path. Run cargo test -p dirijor-mcp from diri/ and follow CONTRIBUTING.md for the remaining checks. No agent account or SSH host is required

📅 Opened Sep 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for cristicretu/diri

When evaluating whether to contribute to cristicretu/diri, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of cristicretu/diri acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 56.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to cristicretu/diri

01

Is cristicretu/diri welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

cristicretu/diri has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.5 places cristicretu/diri in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for cristicretu/diri?

The external pull request merge rate is 56.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in cristicretu/diri?

Yes, cristicretu/diri currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for cristicretu/diri are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.