containers/ramalama - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

RamaLama is an open-source developer tool that simplifies the local serving of AI models from any source and facilitates their use for inference in production, all through the familiar language of containers.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 44%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is containers/ramalama welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

containers/ramalama has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in containers/ramalama respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.8 places containers/ramalama in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for containers/ramalama?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for containers/ramalama is 44.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in containers/ramalama?

containers/ramalama currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

containers
containers/ramalamaA•Welcoming3.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
containers

containers/ramalama

3,013
InactiveA•Welcoming(58/100)Python

RamaLama is an open-source developer tool that simplifies the local serving of AI models from any source and facilitates their use for inference in production, all through the familiar language of containers.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Mentor

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Responsive & active maintainer team in containers/ramalama. Reviews pull requests with focus on project architectural goals.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
44.4%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
18 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
44.4%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe57/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for containers/ramalama
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/containers/ramalama)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/containers/ramalama?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Issue Description The docs describes new line continuation characters as just \, however, in practice chat actually requires a space followed by \. This comes from this implementation in chat.py self.content.append(user_content.rstrip(" \\")) Steps to reproduce the issue run a model Begin typing a message with a continuation line. e.g. "hello\ how are you?" Describe the results you received The new line character submits the message rather than continuing. Describe the results you expected A multiline message. ramalama info output { "Accelerator": "none", "Config": { "api_key": "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", "carimage": "quay.io/ramalama/ramalama", "engine": "docker", "settings": { "config_files": [ "/Users/ieaves/.config/ramalama/ramalama.conf" ] },

📅 Opened Feb 18, 2026💬 11 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Issue Description llama-server /models api returns a 503 error while the model is loading. ramalama run handles this but ramalama chat currently does not. For interactive use this isn't a major issue but it would be good to fix this. Worked around this for CI in #2342 Steps to reproduce the issue Run ramalama chat soon after ramalama serve --detach Describe the results you received ramalama chat fails Describe the results you expected ramalama chat succeeds ramalama info output N/A Upstream Latest Release Yes Additional environment details No response Additional information No response

📅 Opened Jan 24, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for containers/ramalama

When evaluating whether to contribute to containers/ramalama, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of containers/ramalama acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 44.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to containers/ramalama

01

Is containers/ramalama welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

containers/ramalama has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.8 places containers/ramalama in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for containers/ramalama?

The external pull request merge rate is 44.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in containers/ramalama?

Yes, containers/ramalama currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for containers/ramalama are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.