confident-ai/deepeval - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The LLM Evaluation Framework

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 47/100

External PR Merge Rate: 40%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is confident-ai/deepeval welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

confident-ai/deepeval has a recorded first-timer success rate of 23.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in confident-ai/deepeval respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 62.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 46.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 46.8 places confident-ai/deepeval in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for confident-ai/deepeval?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for confident-ai/deepeval is 39.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in confident-ai/deepeval?

confident-ai/deepeval currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

confident-ai
confident-ai/deepevalBSolid18.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
confident-ai

confident-ai/deepeval

17,962
BSolid(47/100)Python

The LLM Evaluation Framework

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.6/10
Patience Score
7.2/10
Nitpick Rate
43%

Rigorous architecture standards (66% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in confident-ai/deepeval.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
39.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
23.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
51 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
39.6%
Merge Gauge
23.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe23/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for confident-ai/deepeval
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/confident-ai/deepeval)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/confident-ai/deepeval?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Hi folks - we recently released our plans for Typescript support, and we could borrow some help if some is available :) The current /typescript folder already contains and acts as a client wrapper to Confident AI, and currently already supports tracing. Our goal is to make local evals, simulation, and synthetic data generation, available in Typescript by July 1st. We're leaving out benchmarks on purpose because we don't believe that's what Typescript users want. Here are the initial TODOs: Support local evaluation models Support for complete metrics parity, with shared templates Support for unit test based testing workflows (similar to evals iterator, evaluate function, and deepeval test run) Post July 1st: Support for complete feature parity with regards to synthetic data generation Support for complete feature parity with regards to simulation Support for prompt optimization If you're interested, please comment below.

📅 Opened Jun 9, 2026💬 12 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

It could be useful to give users flexibility over the user prompt used to generate the goldens in the synthesizer. generate_goldens_from_contexts and a_generate_goldens_from_contexts may be overridden when inheriting from the Synthesizer class and rely on predefined prompt templates composed from specific arguments context, max_goldens_per_context, scenario, task, input_format deepeval/deepeval/synthesizer/synthesizer.py Lines 661 to 667 in a740ca3 prompt = SynthesizerTemplate.generate_synthetic_inputs( context=context, max_goldens_per_context=max_goldens_per_context, scenario=self.styling_config.scenario, task=self.styling_config.task, input_format=self.styling_config

📅 Opened Dec 26, 2025💬 15 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for confident-ai/deepeval

When evaluating whether to contribute to confident-ai/deepeval, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of confident-ai/deepeval acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 39.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to confident-ai/deepeval

01

Is confident-ai/deepeval welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

confident-ai/deepeval has a recorded first-timer success rate of 23.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 46.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 46.8 places confident-ai/deepeval in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for confident-ai/deepeval?

The external pull request merge rate is 39.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in confident-ai/deepeval?

Yes, confident-ai/deepeval currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for confident-ai/deepeval are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.