clastix/kamaji - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 48%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is clastix/kamaji welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

clastix/kamaji has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in clastix/kamaji respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 31.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.2 places clastix/kamaji in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for clastix/kamaji?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for clastix/kamaji is 48.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in clastix/kamaji?

clastix/kamaji currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

clastix
clastix/kamajiA•Welcoming2.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
clastix

clastix/kamaji

2,035
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(58/100)Go

Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in clastix/kamaji. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
48.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
10 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
48.0%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe46/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for clastix/kamaji
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/clastix/kamaji)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/clastix/kamaji?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

What I am trying to do Rotate a TenantControlPlane's ServiceAccount signing key without invalidating every projected token in the tenant at once. kube-apiserver already separates the two jobs: --service-account-key-file — what it will verify. Repeatable (StringArray), and one file may hold several PEM keys. --service-account-signing-key-file — the single key it signs with. So a safe rotation is three moves: widen the verify list to old+new, switch signing to new, and after the longest live token TTL drop the old key. At no point is a live token refused. What happens today Deleting <tcp>-sa-certificate and letting Kamaji regenerate is a hard rotation: the API server returns signing and verifying with one new key, so every existing projected token is refused immediately. On our tenant that took out CoreDNS and the konnectivity agents — both authenticate with projected tokens — and with in-cluster DNS gone, workloads could not resolve anything. Recovery took 26 minutes, unattend

📅 Opened Sep 22, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Summary Certificate/TLS hardening findings in internal/crypto/crypto.go and internal/datastore/datastore.go. None is remotely exploitable on its own; these are least-privilege / robustness improvements. Findings 1. Client-auth certificate gets overly broad Extended Key Usages (Medium) internal/crypto/crypto.go:269-273 NewCertificateTemplate (used for etcd client authentication, datastore_certificate.go:143) sets ExtKeyUsage to ClientAuth, ServerAuth and CodeSigning. For a pure client-auth certificate, ServerAuth/CodeSigning are unnecessary. The subject organization is also system:masters (line 264), i.e. a highly privileged etcd identity — if the key leaks it is additionally abusable as a server cert and for code signing. Fix: restrict EKU to x509.ExtKeyUsageClientAuth. 2. Certificate serial number from math/rand; static SubjectKeyId (Low) internal/crypto/crypto.go:16,261,268 SerialNumber: big.NewInt(mathrand.Int63()), SubjectKeyId: []byte{1, 2, 3, 4, 6}, math/rand is non-cryptograph

📅 Opened Jul 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Summary Correctness and resource-safety bugs in the relational datastore drivers (internal/datastore/mysql.go, postgresql.go). Two of the original four findings are fixed, verified against master 0203099: MySQL migration switches to namespace_name instead of the configured schema — fixed in #1239: mysql.go:78 and :110 use tcp.Status.Storage.Setup.Schema, quoted. GrantPrivilegesExists leaks a connection on the match path — fixed in #1221: the Query and row loop became a single QueryRowContext(...).Scan(...), so there is no rows to leak and the //nolint:sqlclosecheck is gone. The two below are still present. I re-checked both against the library sources and corrected the original descriptions — the first was mis-attributed as a data race, the second was overstated. 1. PostgreSQL: switchDatabaseFn mutates the root connection's options internal/datastore/postgresql.go:113-118 fn := func(dbName string) *pg.DB { o := opt // copies the pointer, not the struct o.Data

📅 Opened Jul 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for clastix/kamaji

When evaluating whether to contribute to clastix/kamaji, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of clastix/kamaji acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 48.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to clastix/kamaji

01

Is clastix/kamaji welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

clastix/kamaji has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.2 places clastix/kamaji in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for clastix/kamaji?

The external pull request merge rate is 48.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in clastix/kamaji?

Yes, clastix/kamaji currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for clastix/kamaji are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.