churnish/dynamic-views - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Obsidian plugin that adds elegant grid and masonry card views for Bases.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 8/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is churnish/dynamic-views welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

churnish/dynamic-views has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in churnish/dynamic-views respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 8.0 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 8.0 places churnish/dynamic-views in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for churnish/dynamic-views?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for churnish/dynamic-views is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in churnish/dynamic-views?

churnish/dynamic-views currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

churnish
churnish/dynamic-viewsDRisky220
GitHub
Back to Explorer
churnish

churnish/dynamic-views

220
DRisky(8/100)TypeScript

Obsidian plugin that adds elegant grid and masonry card views for Bases.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.6/10
Patience Score
7.6/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Strict review standards in churnish/dynamic-views. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in churnish/dynamic-views focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • 1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • 2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • 3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Run the repository formatter and linter locally
  • Keep PRs small and focused on one change
  • Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
  • Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for churnish/dynamic-views
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/churnish/dynamic-views)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/churnish/dynamic-views?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem After a column count change (resize), estimateUnmountedHeight() systematically overestimates unmounted card heights. When the user scrolls to these cards, the mount → remeasure → scroll compensation cycle causes a visible content shift ("reposition"). Root cause: estimateUnmountedHeight() in virtual-scroll.ts splits card height into scalableHeight (covers — scales with width) and fixedHeight (text, properties, header — treated as constant). But fixedHeight IS width-dependent: wider cards → less text wrapping → shorter actual height. The "fixed" portion isn't fixed. Measured drift: -72 to -137px per card after column increase (e.g., 2→5 cols). Scroll compensations up to -453px observed. Affects both views: Grid and Masonry share estimateUnmountedHeight(). Masonry currently animates the jump to soften it; Grid has no mitigation yet. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code

📅 Opened Mar 15, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Allow to pin a property group, such that it always shows up as first — regardless of sort order.

📅 Opened Feb 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Add an option to format a link property as a card button. Example Property link has value [Open](https://example.com). Property wikilink has value [[My note|Read]]. Both would show up as buttons Open and Read. Could even support adding Lucide, emoji, or custom SVG icons via link_icon and wikilink_icon properties. Why Pressing buttons is cooler than pressing on lame bare links. Easier on mobile too.

📅 Opened Feb 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

(The ones that are shown to the left of property names in YAML.) Ideally, support custom icons set by plugins like: Iconic Better Properties

📅 Opened Feb 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Unsure if feasible. Ideally, would also support Quiet Outline.

📅 Opened Feb 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for churnish/dynamic-views

When evaluating whether to contribute to churnish/dynamic-views, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of churnish/dynamic-views acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to churnish/dynamic-views

01

Is churnish/dynamic-views welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

churnish/dynamic-views has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 8.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 8.0 places churnish/dynamic-views in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for churnish/dynamic-views?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in churnish/dynamic-views?

Yes, churnish/dynamic-views currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for churnish/dynamic-views are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.