cefsharp/CefSharp - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

.NET (WPF and Windows Forms) bindings for the Chromium Embedded Framework

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 52/100

External PR Merge Rate: 56%

Response Time: 22h

First Timer Success: 75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is cefsharp/CefSharp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

cefsharp/CefSharp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in cefsharp/CefSharp respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 22.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 51.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 51.6 places cefsharp/CefSharp in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for cefsharp/CefSharp?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for cefsharp/CefSharp is 56.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in cefsharp/CefSharp?

cefsharp/CefSharp currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

cefsharp
cefsharp/CefSharpB•Solid10.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
cefsharp

cefsharp/CefSharp

10,255
InactiveB•Solid(52/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)C#

.NET (WPF and Windows Forms) bindings for the Chromium Embedded Framework

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.1/10
Patience Score
7.5/10
Nitpick Rate
37%

Balanced & professional review environment in cefsharp/CefSharp. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
22 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
56.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
75.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
56.3%
Merge Gauge
75.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for cefsharp/CefSharp
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/cefsharp/CefSharp)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/cefsharp/CefSharp?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Describe the solution you'd like I moved from IContextMenuHandler to CefSharp.Wpf.Handler.ContextMenuHandler in order to avoid #1882. As a result, the context menu now has the default WPF styling, which doesn't really fit Chrome or modern Windows. I would like to be able to set the context menu's Style property; however, the context menu is instantiated ad-hoc, so this doesn't seem possible. I.e., I would like either a property ContextMenuStyle on CefSharp.Wpf.ChromiumWebBrowser to set the style beforehand, then if set, have CefSharp.Wpf.Handler.ContextMenuHandler apply it or an event ContextMenuCreated in CefSharp.Wpf.Handler.ContextMenuHandler which I can listen to Describe alternatives you've considered implementing IContextMenuHandler myself (or inheriting from CefSharp.Wpf.Handler.ContextMenuHandler. However, that seems like a lot of error-prone work. using CefSharp.Wpf.Handler.ContextMenuHandler but overriding RunContextMenu to grab the created ContextMenu. This doesn't (seem

📅 Opened May 4, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for cefsharp/CefSharp

When evaluating whether to contribute to cefsharp/CefSharp, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of cefsharp/CefSharp acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 22 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 56.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to cefsharp/CefSharp

01

Is cefsharp/CefSharp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

cefsharp/CefSharp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~22 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 51.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 51.6 places cefsharp/CefSharp in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for cefsharp/CefSharp?

The external pull request merge rate is 56.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in cefsharp/CefSharp?

Yes, cefsharp/CefSharp currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for cefsharp/CefSharp are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.