cdcseacave/openMVS - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

open Structure-fom-Motion and Multi-View Stereo reconstruction library

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 50/100

External PR Merge Rate: 45%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is cdcseacave/openMVS welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

cdcseacave/openMVS has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in cdcseacave/openMVS respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 50.2 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 50.2 places cdcseacave/openMVS in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for cdcseacave/openMVS?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for cdcseacave/openMVS is 45.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in cdcseacave/openMVS?

cdcseacave/openMVS does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

cdcseacave
cdcseacave/openMVSB•Solid4.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
cdcseacave

cdcseacave/openMVS

4,151
InactiveB•Solid(50/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)C++

open Structure-fom-Motion and Multi-View Stereo reconstruction library

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active C++ repository in cdcseacave/openMVS with ongoing community development and issue triage.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with C++ style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • •Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
45.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
45.5%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe33/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for cdcseacave/openMVS
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/cdcseacave/openMVS)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/cdcseacave/openMVS?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for cdcseacave/openMVS.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for cdcseacave/openMVS

When evaluating whether to contribute to cdcseacave/openMVS, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of cdcseacave/openMVS acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 45.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to cdcseacave/openMVS

01

Is cdcseacave/openMVS welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

cdcseacave/openMVS has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 50.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 50.2 places cdcseacave/openMVS in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for cdcseacave/openMVS?

The external pull request merge rate is 45.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in cdcseacave/openMVS?

cdcseacave/openMVS does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for cdcseacave/openMVS are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.