bytedeco/javacpp-presets - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The missing Java distribution of native C++ libraries

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 63%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is bytedeco/javacpp-presets welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

bytedeco/javacpp-presets has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in bytedeco/javacpp-presets respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.9 places bytedeco/javacpp-presets in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for bytedeco/javacpp-presets?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for bytedeco/javacpp-presets is 63.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in bytedeco/javacpp-presets?

bytedeco/javacpp-presets currently has 19 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

bytedeco
bytedeco/javacpp-presetsA•Welcoming2.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
bytedeco

bytedeco/javacpp-presets

2,847
InactiveA•Welcoming(58/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Java

The missing Java distribution of native C++ libraries

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in bytedeco/javacpp-presets. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
75.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.2%
Merge Gauge
75.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe48/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for bytedeco/javacpp-presets
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/bytedeco/javacpp-presets)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/bytedeco/javacpp-presets?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

HI @saudet : could javapp-pytorch support "torch::jit::export_onnx", it will make cpp -java-python pytorch model deploy all easy

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 35/100Contribute

java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no jniopencv_imgcodec in java.library.path Caused by: /usr/local/opt/libavif/lib/libavif.16.dylib (no such file) This affects both 4.13.0-1.5.13 and 4.14.0-1.5.14: opencv-4.14.0-1.5.14-macosx-x86_64.jar has a hard dependency from libopencv_imgcodecs.414.dylib to /usr/local/opt/libavif/lib/libavif.16.dylib This only affects the x86_64 version, arm64 seems to be clean. In contrast, 4.9.0-1.5.10 was fine. What should happen instead: libavif should be bundled and referenced from the jar.

📅 Opened Sep 18, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

This is the same as the issue #1797 that was happening in 13.3-9.24-1.5.14-SNAPSHOT, and that was solved in 13.3-9.24-1.5.14-SNAPSHOT. On Arch Linux, when convolution is required by ORT CUDA EP, it fails if the cudnn library is provided by the javacpp redist, and works well if the javacpp's redist dependency for cudnn is commented out, and provided by the system. I have the latest versions, as before, so it looks exactly as the bug that @saudet solved in the snapshot (I'm not sure how). It resurfaces in the release. I attach the JavaCPP debug logs here, and more details about how I experience this bug is provided in the linked issue (same code, updated dependencies from JavaCPP SNAPSHOT to release) javacpp.log

📅 Opened Aug 19, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Hi @saudet Problem Description When iterating elements from ModuleListImpl via its iterator / .get() method, all returned objects are exposed as the base type org.bytedeco.pytorch.Module with full type erasure at the JNI boundary. Even though the underlying native module is our custom Scala layer (e.g. torchrec.basic.layers.MLP which extends Module), attempting to cast the returned Module reference back to the concrete subclass throws a hard ClassCastException. Exception Stack plaintext Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: class org.bytedeco.pytorch.Module cannot be cast to class torchrec.basic.layers.MLP (org.bytedeco.pytorch.Module and torchrec.basic.layers.MLP are in unnamed module of loader 'app') Root Cause Analysis ModuleListImpl JNI accessor only returns the generic base Module handle without retaining runtime subclass metadata of wrapped custom layers; All custom layers (MLP, CapsuleNetwork, CrossLayer etc.) inherit from Module, but JNI layer type informatio

📅 Opened Jun 16, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

private val sequential = new SequentialImpl() sequential.push_back(new DropoutImpl(dropout)) iceSupport] active device backend: cpu (requested=AUTO, cuda=false, mps=false, os=linux) # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007665b7153e37, pid=3256199, tid=3256200 # # JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment Oracle GraalVM 25+37.1 (25.0+37) (build 25+37-LTS-jvmci-b01) # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Oracle GraalVM 25+37.1 (25+37-LTS-jvmci-b01, mixed mode, sharing, tiered, jvmci, jvmci compiler, compressed oops, compressed class ptrs, g1 gc, linux-amd64) # Problematic frame: # C [libjnitorch.so+0x1753e37] torch::nn::AnyModuleHolder<torch::nn::DropoutImpl, at::Tensor>::forward(std::vector<torch::nn::AnyValue, std::allocator<torch::nn::AnyValue> >&&)+0x37 # # Core dump will be written. Default location: Core dumps may be processed with "/usr/share/apport/apport -p%p -s%s -c%c -d%d -P%P -u%u -g%g -F%F -- %E"

📅 Opened Jun 16, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for bytedeco/javacpp-presets

When evaluating whether to contribute to bytedeco/javacpp-presets, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of bytedeco/javacpp-presets acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to bytedeco/javacpp-presets

01

Is bytedeco/javacpp-presets welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

bytedeco/javacpp-presets has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.9 places bytedeco/javacpp-presets in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for bytedeco/javacpp-presets?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in bytedeco/javacpp-presets?

Yes, bytedeco/javacpp-presets currently has 19 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for bytedeco/javacpp-presets are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.