bvis/aegis-hass - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Aegis — Unofficial Home Assistant integration for Ajax Security Systems and co-branded apps

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 13%

Response Time: 5h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is bvis/aegis-hass welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

bvis/aegis-hass has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in bvis/aegis-hass respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 5.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.3 places bvis/aegis-hass in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for bvis/aegis-hass?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for bvis/aegis-hass is 13.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in bvis/aegis-hass?

bvis/aegis-hass currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

bvis
bvis/aegis-hassA•Welcoming115
GitHub
Back to Explorer
bvis

bvis/aegis-hass

115
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(58/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Aegis — Unofficial Home Assistant integration for Ajax Security Systems and co-branded apps

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.0/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Strict review standards in bvis/aegis-hass. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in bvis/aegis-hass focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
Response Velocity
5 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
13.3%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
10 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
13.3%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe31/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for bvis/aegis-hass
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/bvis/aegis-hass)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/bvis/aegis-hass?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Four action blocks are present in every language file but still hold their English text. The keys are all there — a test now enforces that — so this is purely about the values, and it is the kind of thing a native speaker fixes in two minutes and a maintainer guesses badly. Status (updated 2026-09-09). Done: it (wip3out3r, #477), nl (aavdberg, #483 + #484), es (#485), uk — which already carried all 26 values in Cyrillic — and da, a whole new language contributed by webliodk in #488 with exact key parity. de, fr, pt, pt-BR and ca are in #493, translated by the maintainer from each file's existing vocabulary (see the status comment below for why, and what still needs a native eye there). Four languages left, each needing a native speaker: cs, pl, ro, tr. #493 also localises the press_panic_button field names (Entity / Latitude / Longitude), a fifth gap that was still English in 13 of 14 locales. Affected in 12 of the 13 non-English languages (es already has them): Correction: es

📅 Opened Sep 8, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Six MotionCam families the integration already knows get no camera entity, and four of them have phod in their own device-type name yet get no photo-on-demand button. This became visible while reviewing #469 (PR-3 of #332), which moved camera and PhOD detection into the handler registry and preserved the previous behaviour exactly, as a refactor should. The registry knows 139 device families. The ones that get a camera entity are these six: motion_cam, motion_cam_outdoor, motion_cam_fibra, motion_cam_phod, motion_cam_outdoor_phod, motion_cam_fibra_base and the last three of those are also the only ones that get a capture button. The MotionCam families that get neither: motion_cam_g3 motion_cam_hd motion_cam_phod_fibra motion_cam_outdoor_two_four_phod motion_cam_s_phod motion_cam_s_phod_am They do get their motion, tamper and delay sensors — they are fully modelled detectors — so what is missing is the camera entity that shows the last capture, and for the four phod ones the butto

📅 Opened Sep 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description Hi, First of all, thank you for this great integration! I'm using an Ajax MultiTransmitter with several wired magnetic contacts. Each wire input is correctly discovered as a device, but Home Assistant only exposes the following entity: binary_sensor._wire_input_alert This entity only represents the alarm state (device_class: safety). What is currently missing is the actual contact state (open / closed). For example, in the official Ajax app and in other integrations (such as the Jeedom Ajax plugin), it is possible to know whether the wired contact is currently open or closed, independently from the alarm state. This would be very useful for: Door and gate status Garage door status Home Assistant automations Dashboard cards From the diagnostics, the wire input currently exposes: { "type": "wire_input_mt", "state": "online", "online": true, "statuses": [ "armed_in_night_mode" ] } ### Use case This would be very useful for: - Door and gate status - Garage d

📅 Opened Aug 7, 2026💬 22 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description Add the ability to view active Ajax account sessions and terminate (drop) them from within the Home Assistant integration, mirroring what the official Ajax mobile app already offers ("Active sessions" → log out a device). Ideally: A way to list the current account's active sessions with their key attributes (device model, OS, app label, last-connection IP, creation/refresh time, active flag). A way to drop/terminate a specific session (and/or "log out all other sessions"). Possible HA surface: a diagnostic sensor whose attributes list the sessions, plus a service (or per-session button) to drop a session by session_id. Use case This directly helps diagnose and fix the most common real-time-push problem with this integration. Ajax does not reliably deliver one account's FCM push to two active sessions at once, so a second session (phone app, desktop/web app, another HA instance) silently starves Home Assistant's push channel — fcm_connected shows 1/1 but pushes_receive

📅 Opened Jul 18, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Context Since 1.10.0, SpaceControl keyfobs surface as a single Keyfobs device with one experimental per-keyfob Active binary sensor (diagnostic). Who armed/disarmed via a keyfob is already attributed in the logbook independently of this sensor. What's unconfirmed The active / inactive value of that sensor is experimental and not yet validated. On every install that produces the sensor, every keyfob reports as active — and a keyfob can only be deactivated server-side by an installer or monitoring company. So there has never been an inactive example to validate the indicator against; it may not correctly reflect a genuinely deactivated keyfob. Two corrections to this issue's original wording, both from @wip3out3r's measurements — worth reading before spending time on it: Neither of the Ajax app's two deactivation entries is the toggle this issue needs, and there is no third. Permanent deactivation (English docs) and Disattivazione forzata (Italian docs) are Ajax's two names for one

📅 Opened Jun 19, 2026💬 14 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for bvis/aegis-hass

When evaluating whether to contribute to bvis/aegis-hass, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of bvis/aegis-hass acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 13.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to bvis/aegis-hass

01

Is bvis/aegis-hass welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

bvis/aegis-hass has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.3 places bvis/aegis-hass in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for bvis/aegis-hass?

The external pull request merge rate is 13.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in bvis/aegis-hass?

Yes, bvis/aegis-hass currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for bvis/aegis-hass are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.