bitcoinppl/cove - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Cove - The simple bitcoin wallet

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 51/100

External PR Merge Rate: 76%

Response Time: 11d

First Timer Success: 27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is bitcoinppl/cove welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

bitcoinppl/cove has a recorded first-timer success rate of 26.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in bitcoinppl/cove respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 253.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 51.4 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 51.4 places bitcoinppl/cove in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for bitcoinppl/cove?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for bitcoinppl/cove is 75.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in bitcoinppl/cove?

bitcoinppl/cove currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

bitcoinppl
bitcoinppl/coveBSolid117
GitHub
Back to Explorer
bitcoinppl

bitcoinppl/cove

117
BSolid(51/100)Kotlin

Cove - The simple bitcoin wallet

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
10 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
75.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
26.7%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
9 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
75.6%
Merge Gauge
26.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe38/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for bitcoinppl/cove
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/bitcoinppl/cove)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/bitcoinppl/cove?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Summary Keep test-only helpers out of production modules. Prefer free functions or helpers inside #[cfg(test)] mod tests, not #[cfg(test)] methods/fields on production types. This matches the project rule: test-only functions, types, and modules stay under mod tests (or a dedicated mod test_support), and production paths stay free of test scaffolding. Motivation On keyteleport, we already cleaned up cases like: SenderSession::with_private_key_and_password → free helper in mod tests RustKeyTeleportManager::current_generation → helper inside mod tests The same pattern still exists on master and should be refactored the same way. Scope (found on master) Test-only methods on production impls File Item rust/crates/cove-common/src/logging/capture.rs snapshot_text, clear rust/src/database/cloud_backup.rs delete rust/src/manager/cloud_backup_manager.rs clear_pending_enable_session rust/src/manager/cloud_backup_manager/actors/cleanup.rs is_idle_for_test rust/src/manager/clo

📅 Opened Jul 29, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for bitcoinppl/cove

When evaluating whether to contribute to bitcoinppl/cove, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of bitcoinppl/cove acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 75.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to bitcoinppl/cove

01

Is bitcoinppl/cove welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

bitcoinppl/cove has a recorded first-timer success rate of 26.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 51.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 51.4 places bitcoinppl/cove in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for bitcoinppl/cove?

The external pull request merge rate is 75.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in bitcoinppl/cove?

Yes, bitcoinppl/cove currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for bitcoinppl/cove are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.