basementstudio/xmcp - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The TypeScript MCP framework

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is basementstudio/xmcp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

basementstudio/xmcp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in basementstudio/xmcp respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.7 places basementstudio/xmcp in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for basementstudio/xmcp?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for basementstudio/xmcp is 64.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in basementstudio/xmcp?

basementstudio/xmcp does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

basementstudio
basementstudio/xmcpA•Welcoming1.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
basementstudio

basementstudio/xmcp

1,333
InactiveA•Welcoming(58/100)TypeScript

The TypeScript MCP framework

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in basementstudio/xmcp. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in basementstudio/xmcp focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Run the repository formatter and linter locally
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
64.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
64.1%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe41/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for basementstudio/xmcp
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/basementstudio/xmcp)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/basementstudio/xmcp?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Problem statement Currently, when a tool is invoked during an MCP server run (e.g., by an agent, user query, or workflow), there is zero built-in visibility into what happened. Developers have no straightforward way to observe: Which specific tool was called When the tool execution started and finished How long the tool took to complete Whether the tool call succeeded or failed Any basic error message if it failed Proposed solution Emit structured logs for every tool/prompt/resource execution: [tool] Executing 'get-weather' | input: { "location": "Buenos Aires" } [tool] 'get-weather' completed | duration: 320ms | success This should be enable/disable from the xmcp.config.ts Package xmcp (core framework)

📅 Opened Jan 21, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for basementstudio/xmcp

When evaluating whether to contribute to basementstudio/xmcp, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of basementstudio/xmcp acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 64.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to basementstudio/xmcp

01

Is basementstudio/xmcp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

basementstudio/xmcp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.7 places basementstudio/xmcp in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for basementstudio/xmcp?

The external pull request merge rate is 64.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in basementstudio/xmcp?

basementstudio/xmcp does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for basementstudio/xmcp are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.