Autonomous background coding agents on AWS. Turn tasks into pull requests via isolated runtimes, with built-in orchestration, observability, and governance.
C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100
External PR Merge Rate: 78%
Response Time: 14h
First Timer Success: 65%
aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents has a recorded first-timer success rate of 64.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 14.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.6 places aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents in the A tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents is 78.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.
Autonomous background coding agents on AWS. Turn tasks into pull requests via isolated runtimes, with built-in orchestration, observability, and governance.
Strict review standards in aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
Historical health & responsiveness evolution
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 17:00 UTC (17:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Tuesday - Thursday from 17:00 to 21:00 UTC (17:00 - 21:00 UTC local).
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~9 hours (96% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~68 hours (35% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Summary Add a bgagent linear remove-workspace <slug> CLI command that lets a Linear-workspace admin deregister a workspace previously onboarded via bgagent linear setup or bgagent linear add-workspace. Surfaced during PR #160 review (krokoko) — tracked as a follow-up that never landed. Today, removing a workspace requires manual surgery across DDB and Secrets Manager, which is error-prone and undocumented. Motivation Workspace onboarding is a one-line CLI command. Workspace removal isn't — operators have to: Find the row in LinearWorkspaceRegistryTable and either delete it or flip status to revoked Delete the per-workspace OAuth secret in Secrets Manager (bgagent-linear-oauth-<slug>) (Optional) Clean up LinearProjectMappingTable rows for that workspace Without the command, a workspace removal can leave dangling secrets, stale registry rows that the resolver still reads, or orphan project mappings that confuse operators. Proposed UX $ bgagent linear remove-workspace acme Found wor
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 14 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 78.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents has a recorded first-timer success rate of 64.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~14 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.6 places aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents in the Welcoming tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 78.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.
All metrics displayed for aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.