astronomer/astronomer-cosmos - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Run your dbt Core or dbt Fusion projects as Apache Airflow DAGs and Task Groups with a few lines of code

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is astronomer/astronomer-cosmos welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

astronomer/astronomer-cosmos has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in astronomer/astronomer-cosmos respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 38.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.6 places astronomer/astronomer-cosmos in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for astronomer/astronomer-cosmos?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for astronomer/astronomer-cosmos is 80.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in astronomer/astronomer-cosmos?

astronomer/astronomer-cosmos currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

astronomer
astronomer/astronomer-cosmosA•Welcoming1.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
astronomer

astronomer/astronomer-cosmos

1,264
InactiveA•Welcoming(64/100)Python

Run your dbt Core or dbt Fusion projects as Apache Airflow DAGs and Task Groups with a few lines of code

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.7/10
Patience Score
7.3/10
Nitpick Rate
41%

Rigorous architecture standards (63% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in astronomer/astronomer-cosmos.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.9%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
20 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.9%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for astronomer/astronomer-cosmos
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/astronomer/astronomer-cosmos)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/astronomer/astronomer-cosmos?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Bug description When Cosmos invokes dbt in-process via InvocationMode.DBT_RUNNER, dbt's flags.INVOCATION_COMMAND resolves to the host process's command line — e.g. the Celery worker startup command — rather than the dbt command Cosmos actually ran. Users who log {{ flags.INVOCATION_COMMAND }} from an on-run-end hook (or via packages such as dbt_artifacts / Elementary that persist invocation metadata) get rows like: dbt celery worker --queues dbt-producer-queue -c 6 --without-gossip --without-mingle instead of the expected: dbt --log-format json --debug build -s tag:MY_TAG --vars {"dag_id": "..."} --target PROD This makes the invocation-command column useless for auditing which dbt selector / target / vars produced a given run. Root cause dbt-core builds the value from sys.argv, unconditionally, with no dbtRunner-aware path (dbt/cli/flags.py, dbt-core 1.11.x — same in earlier 1.x): # Add entire invocation command to flags object.__setattr__(self, "INVOCATION_COMMAND", "dbt " + "

📅 Opened Aug 19, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

When a profile mapping's required secret is absent from the Airflow connection, Cosmos fails with: cosmos.exceptions.CosmosValueError: Could not find a value for secret field password. The message names neither the profile mapping, the connection, nor where Cosmos looked (cosmos/profiles/base.py:238), so users read it as a stale manifest or a cached profile rather than a connection/mapping mismatch. A common trigger: a Snowflake connection is switched from user/password to key-pair auth, while ProfileConfig still uses SnowflakeUserPasswordProfileMapping — which requires password (cosmos/profiles/snowflake/user_pass.py:24-34) and resolves it from profile_args["password"], then conn.password (base.py:288-317). Both are empty after the switch, and the resulting traceback points at env_vars rather than at the connection. Suggested message SnowflakeUserPasswordProfileMapping could not resolve the required dbt profile field 'password'. Cosmos looked in ProfileConfig(profile_args={'passwor

📅 Opened Aug 19, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Description Cosmos converts an Airflow connection into a dbt profiles.yml via the configured profile mapping. The contents of the rendered profile are only logged at INFO when profile caching is disabled — when caching is enabled (the default, since enable_cache_profile = True), only the cache path is logged, not the contents. This is a meaningful diagnostic gap: a substantial class of "Cosmos generates the wrong profile" or "Cosmos drops a connection field" issues can only be confirmed by inspecting the rendered file, which requires either: Toggling AIRFLOW__COSMOS__ENABLE_CACHE_PROFILE=False and re-running, or Shelling into the worker and cat-ing the file under /tmp/cosmos/profile/<hash>/profiles.yml. Both are workable but slow, and on managed/serverless deployments (1) requires a redeploy and (2) is often impossible. Where this happens RenderConfig.ensure_profile (around lines 373-411 at the time of writing): Non-cached branch logs the full contents via logger.info("... with th

📅 Opened May 28, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for astronomer/astronomer-cosmos

When evaluating whether to contribute to astronomer/astronomer-cosmos, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of astronomer/astronomer-cosmos acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to astronomer/astronomer-cosmos

01

Is astronomer/astronomer-cosmos welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

astronomer/astronomer-cosmos has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.6 places astronomer/astronomer-cosmos in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for astronomer/astronomer-cosmos?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in astronomer/astronomer-cosmos?

Yes, astronomer/astronomer-cosmos currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for astronomer/astronomer-cosmos are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.