arthurpanhku/dvalincode - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Approvable, local-first AI coding agent for regulated teams: policy controls, governed MCP, evidence packs, audit trails, secure remediation, and any OpenAI-compatible model.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 87%

Response Time: 4h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is arthurpanhku/dvalincode welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

arthurpanhku/dvalincode has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in arthurpanhku/dvalincode respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.8 places arthurpanhku/dvalincode in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for arthurpanhku/dvalincode?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for arthurpanhku/dvalincode is 86.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in arthurpanhku/dvalincode?

arthurpanhku/dvalincode currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

arthurpanhku
arthurpanhku/dvalincodeBSolid112
GitHub
Back to Explorer
arthurpanhku

arthurpanhku/dvalincode

112
BSolid(72/100)TypeScript

Approvable, local-first AI coding agent for regulated teams: policy controls, governed MCP, evidence packs, audit trails, secure remediation, and any OpenAI-compatible model.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in arthurpanhku/dvalincode. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in arthurpanhku/dvalincode focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • 1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • 2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • 3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
3 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
86.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
86.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe92/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for arthurpanhku/dvalincode
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/arthurpanhku/dvalincode)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/arthurpanhku/dvalincode?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Good first issue — a frontend-only first slice of #53 (structured approval engine). A maintainer will help you land it; comment to claim. Goal In the web approval prompt, add an "Allow for this run" option next to the existing approve/deny buttons. This issue is UI only — render the option and surface the user's choice; the backend grant semantics (scope, expiry, audit) are tracked in #53 and are explicitly out of scope here. Where The approval UI component in web/src/ (look for the existing approve/deny prompt; PlanCard.tsx and the onProceed pattern are nearby examples of a button that sends an action). Types in web/src/types.ts (PendingApproval). Acceptance The approval prompt shows a third choice, "Allow for this run". Choosing it is distinguishable from a one-off approve in the value passed up (e.g. a scope: 'run' field) — even though the backend doesn't act on it yet. Existing approve/deny behavior is unchanged. Not in scope Backend enforcement of the run-scoped grant,

📅 Opened Jul 22, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Why #117 surfaces recovered (crashed) turns in the web UI, but the notice is client-side ephemeral — it's built from a live recovered_turn WebSocket event (web/src/hooks/useChat.ts) and disappears on page refresh or session re-open. A user who reloads before re-sending loses the recovered text and the fact that anything was interrupted. Sketch Persist the recovered marker so it re-renders on session restore, either by (a) journaling a lightweight recovered record and replaying it in mapBackendMessages, or (b) re-emitting recovered_turn on reconnect when the session still has an unresolved recovered turn. Keep the one-click Re-send working after restore. No change to what data is stored — the recovered text is already session-journal state. Acceptance Kill the process mid-turn, resume, then reload the web UI → the recovered notice and Re-send button are still there. No notice when there's nothing to recover. Good first issue Self-contained, one hook + one mapper, existing test

📅 Opened Jul 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Why src/harness/run.ts (executeHarnessRun) is the headless entrypoint (docs/HARNESS-MODE.md) and is currently only exercised indirectly via tests/mcp/server.test.ts and tests/commands/run.test.ts. There's no tests/harness/ and, critically, no dedicated test pinning unattended-tier behavior — the most governance-sensitive path, since it runs without a human in the loop. Sketch tests/harness/run.test.ts driving executeHarnessRun directly: happy path, policy-denied tool, and approval-required tool under each UnattendedPermissionMode. A bypass-proof assertion: under the unattended tier, an action that policy forbids is refused and audited — it must not silently auto-approve. Assert the run still produces a verifiable audit chain (run_start … tamper-evident) in headless mode. Acceptance Changing unattended/approval semantics can't regress without a red test. npm run check covers the harness path directly, not just transitively.

📅 Opened Jul 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Why (roadmap: Next) Every model provider is an egress destination that user prompts — often proprietary source — get routed to. Today src/providers/ (anthropic.ts, openaiCompatible.ts) has per-adapter tests, but there's no shared contract every provider must satisfy. That makes "should we trust a new provider?" a subjective call each time (cf. #109). A conformance suite turns it into an objective, reviewable gate. Sketch A single parametrized suite in tests/providers/conformance.test.ts that runs the same assertions against each registered adapter. Contract covers: streaming token deltas, tool/function-call round-trips, error/timeout normalization, and — most importantly for governance — that every request goes through the egress chokepoint (src/providers/egress.ts + trustedBaseUrls.ts), honors redaction, and produces the expected audit events. A bypass-style assertion proving an adapter cannot reach a non-allow-listed base URL. Fixture/mock transport so no real network calls

📅 Opened Jul 18, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Why (roadmap: Next) Per docs/GOVERNED-MCP.md (deferred item): MCP tool calls are audited against the live per-run sink, but the pre-run discovery connection (initialize / tools/list in registerMcpServers, src/agent/session.ts) runs before the run's AuditSink exists — its egress is enforced but not recorded in the run chain. Sketch Options (design discussion welcome): Buffer discovery mcp_request events and append them right after run_start. Record a per-session discovery record in the session journal with connection summaries + anchor. Acceptance A reviewer reading one run's chain can see which MCP servers were contacted during discovery, with host + outcome, under the same minimization rules (no headers/args/bodies).

📅 Opened Jul 2, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for arthurpanhku/dvalincode

When evaluating whether to contribute to arthurpanhku/dvalincode, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of arthurpanhku/dvalincode acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 86.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to arthurpanhku/dvalincode

01

Is arthurpanhku/dvalincode welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

arthurpanhku/dvalincode has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.8 places arthurpanhku/dvalincode in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for arthurpanhku/dvalincode?

The external pull request merge rate is 86.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in arthurpanhku/dvalincode?

Yes, arthurpanhku/dvalincode currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for arthurpanhku/dvalincode are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.